Case Law › High Court › Itta/346/2014 Of The Director Of Income-...

Itta/346/2014 Of The Director Of Income-Tax (Exemptions) v. The Agricultural Market Committee

High Court 11 Jun 2014 In favour of: Assessee

Forum / Bench

High Court · taphc

Parties

Date of order

11 Jun 2014

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Dismissed

Case summary

In Itta/346/2014 Of The Director Of Income-Tax (Exemptions) v. The Agricultural Market Committee, the High Court (2014) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Decision: 346 of 2014 Judgment:(per the Hon’ble the Chief Justice Sri Kalyan JyotiSengupta) We dismiss the appeal as the learned Tribunal has followedthe judgment of this Court on an identical issue.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

THE HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SRI KALYAN JYOTISENGUPTA AND THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR I.T.T.A.No.346 of 2014 DATED:11.6.2014 Between:The Director of Income Tax(Exemptions),Hyderabad. And The Agricultural Market Committee,Adilabad District. … Appellant ….Respondent THE HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SRI KALYAN JYOTISENGUPTA AND THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR I.T.T.A. No. 346 of 2014 Judgment:(per the Hon’ble the Chief Justice Sri Kalyan JyotiSengupta) We dismiss the appeal as the learned Tribunal has followedthe judgment of this Court on an identical issue. Therefore, we do not find any element of law to be decidedin this appeal and the aforesaid judgment of this Court has noapplication to the facts of this case. Consequently, the miscellaneous petitions, if any pending,shall also stand dismissed. No order as to costs. __________________ K.J. SENGUPTA, CJ _________________ SANJAY KUMAR, J 11[th] June, 2014 PNB

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.