Case LawHigh Court › Itta/349/2014 Of J Appa Rao, Hyderabad v...

Itta/349/2014 Of J Appa Rao, Hyderabad v. The Asst Commr Of Income Tax, Hyderabad

High Court 19 Mar 2021 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · taphc
Parties
Itta/349/2014 Of J Appa Rao, Hyderabad v. The Asst Commr Of Income Tax, Hyderabad
Date of order
19 Mar 2021
Assessment year(s)
2006-2007
Outcome
Dismissed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Itta/349/2014 Of J Appa Rao, Hyderabad v. The Asst Commr Of Income Tax, Hyderabad, the High Court (2021) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Decision: In view of the same, this appeal is dismissed as withdrawn withliberly to approach this Court if there is no settlement under the DirectTax Vivad Se Vishwas Act.2020.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANAAT HYDERABAD FRIDAY, THE NINETEENTH DAY OF MARCHTWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY ONE PRESENTTHE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE M.S.RAMACHANDRA RAOANDTHE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T.VINOD KUMAR |.T.T.A. NO: 349 OF 2014 lncome Tax Tribunal Appeal under Section 260-4 of the lncome [Tax Act, against]the order of the lncome Tax Appellate Tribunal, Hyderabad [Bench ][B, ][Hyderabad in ] No.1 51 8/Hyd/2010 for Assessment Year 2006-2007 [dated ][29111113 12112113 ][preferred]against the order of the Commissioner of lncome [Tax ][(Appeals)-Vlll ][Hyderabad, Appeal]No.033/Tr/DCITCC-3/C|T(A)-V|l/10-1 1 dated [2210912010 ][preferred against ][the ][Order ][of]the Assistant Commissioner of lncome Tax, Central [Circle-3, ] No. dated 301 [1 ]212009. Betwee n:J.Appa Rao, F.No.701, Alpine Heights [Block No.1, ][Gulmohar Avenue, ][Somajiguda,]HYderabad ...APPELLANT AND The Assistant Commissioner of lncome Tax, Central [Circle ][-3, ][Hyderabad] ...RESPONOENT For the Appellant : SRI CH.PUSHYAM KIRAN, [Advocate]For the Respondent [:] The Court made the following: ORDER I HONOURABLE SRI JUSTTCB M.S.RAMACHANDRA RAO AND HO.\O L RAI]I-[ S RI J USTIC I,]'f ,\',I \0D I(L;\{AR I.T.T.A. No.349 of 2014 JUDGMENT: lPer Sri Justice t\,1.5 llumuclunlrt lllo) Le irrned collnsel 1br the appe'llant secks to u'ithclrau' the appeal andstates that he has alreadl' tlled letter belbre the Registry seeking suchr,r'ithdrau'ai.states that he has alreadl' tlled letter belbre the Registry seeking suchr,r'ithdrau'ai. 2. In view of the same, this appeal is dismissed as withdrawn withliberly to approach this Court if there is no settlement under the DirectTax Vivad Se Vishwas Act.2020. 3. Pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall also standclismissed. No costs. Sd/-K.SREENIVASA RAOJOINT REGISTRARG,"oSECTION OFFICER //TRUE COPY' To1. The lnrigme-Tax Appellate Tribunal, Hyderabad -"B" Bench, Hyderabad?. 9nu QQ [to Sri Ch.Pushyam ][Kiran, ][Advocate (OPUC)]3. Two CD CopiesKj&* HIGH COURT DATED:19/03/2021 ORDERITTA.No.349 of 2014 D1SI41S6D THE ITTA.fa-/\r*1"4@ IttST4 14:(Pzo09 [2021]c-L**DFepATC9,f[s]
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan