Itta/349/2014 Of J Appa Rao, Hyderabad v. The Asst Commr Of Income Tax, Hyderabad
High Court
19 Mar 2021 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · taphc
Parties
Itta/349/2014 Of J Appa Rao, Hyderabad v. The Asst Commr Of Income Tax, Hyderabad
Date of order
19 Mar 2021
Assessment year(s)
2006-2007
Outcome
Dismissed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Itta/349/2014 Of J Appa Rao, Hyderabad v. The Asst Commr Of Income Tax, Hyderabad, the High Court (2021) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Decision: In view of the same, this appeal is dismissed as withdrawn withliberly to approach this Court if there is no settlement under the DirectTax Vivad Se Vishwas Act.2020.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANAAT HYDERABAD
FRIDAY, THE NINETEENTH DAY OF MARCHTWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY ONE
PRESENTTHE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE M.S.RAMACHANDRA RAOANDTHE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T.VINOD KUMAR
|.T.T.A. NO: 349 OF 2014
lncome Tax Tribunal Appeal under Section 260-4 of the lncome [Tax Act, against]the order of the lncome Tax Appellate Tribunal, Hyderabad [Bench ][B, ][Hyderabad in ] No.1 51 8/Hyd/2010 for Assessment Year 2006-2007 [dated ][29111113 12112113 ][preferred]against the order of the Commissioner of lncome [Tax ][(Appeals)-Vlll ][Hyderabad, Appeal]No.033/Tr/DCITCC-3/C|T(A)-V|l/10-1 1 dated [2210912010 ][preferred against ][the ][Order ][of]the Assistant Commissioner of lncome Tax, Central [Circle-3, ] No. dated 301 [1 ]212009.
Betwee n:J.Appa Rao, F.No.701, Alpine Heights [Block No.1, ][Gulmohar Avenue, ][Somajiguda,]HYderabad
...APPELLANT
AND
The Assistant Commissioner of lncome Tax, Central [Circle ][-3, ][Hyderabad]
...RESPONOENT
For the Appellant : SRI CH.PUSHYAM KIRAN, [Advocate]For the Respondent [:]
The Court made the following: ORDER
I
HONOURABLE SRI JUSTTCB M.S.RAMACHANDRA RAO
AND
HO.\O L RAI]I-[ S RI J USTIC I,]'f ,\',I \0D I(L;\{AR
I.T.T.A. No.349 of 2014
JUDGMENT: lPer Sri Justice t\,1.5 llumuclunlrt lllo)
Le irrned collnsel 1br the appe'llant secks to u'ithclrau' the appeal andstates that he has alreadl' tlled letter belbre the Registry seeking suchr,r'ithdrau'ai.states that he has alreadl' tlled letter belbre the Registry seeking suchr,r'ithdrau'ai.
2. In view of the same, this appeal is dismissed as withdrawn withliberly to approach this Court if there is no settlement under the DirectTax Vivad Se Vishwas Act.2020.
3. Pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall also standclismissed. No costs.
Sd/-K.SREENIVASA RAOJOINT REGISTRARG,"oSECTION OFFICER
//TRUE COPY'
To1. The lnrigme-Tax Appellate Tribunal, Hyderabad -"B" Bench, Hyderabad?. 9nu QQ [to Sri Ch.Pushyam ][Kiran, ][Advocate (OPUC)]3. Two CD CopiesKj&*
HIGH COURT
DATED:19/03/2021
ORDERITTA.No.349 of 2014
D1SI41S6D THE ITTA.fa-/\r*1"4@
IttST4 14:(Pzo09 [2021]c-L**DFepATC9,f[s]
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.