Itta/350/2019 Of The Pr. Commissioner Of Income-Tax v. M/S. Lanco Solar Energy Pvt Ltd
High Court
02 Aug 2023 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · taphc
Parties
Itta/350/2019 Of The Pr. Commissioner Of Income-Tax v. M/S. Lanco Solar Energy Pvt Ltd
Date of order
02 Aug 2023
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Itta/350/2019 Of The Pr. Commissioner Of Income-Tax v. M/S. Lanco Solar Energy Pvt Ltd, the High Court (2023) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: As the appeal itself since been stated to have become infructuous, theITTA is dismissed as infructuous.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Sections referenced in this judgment
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANAAT HYDERABAD
WEDNESDAY, THE SECOND DAY OF AUGUSTTWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY THREE
PRESENT
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE P.SAM KOSHY
AND
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE A. LAXMI NARAYANA
INCOME TAX TRIBUNAL APPEAL [No: ][350 ] [2019]
lncome Tax Tribunal Appeal Under Section [260,4 ][of the ][lncome ][Tax ][Act,]1961 arising out of the order of the lncome{ax [Appellate Tribunal, Hyderabad ][Bench]'B' Hyderabad, in S.A No. 16/Hyd/2019 in l.T.A. No.670/Hyd/2017, [for assessment]Year 2012-13 dated 13-02-2019 [preferred against ][the ][Order ][of ][' ][the ][Assistant]Commissioner of lncome Tax, Circle-16(1 ),Hyderabad [PAN/GlR ][No. ,]daled:28-O2-20'1 7, [preferred against ][the ][Order ][of ][the ][Deputy ][Commissioner ][of]lncome-Tax, (Transfer Pricing Officer)-3, [Hyderabad PAN/GIR ][No. ][ ]dated 27-O1-2016.
Between:
The Pr. Commissioner of lncome{ax-4, [Hyderabad.]
...AppellanURespondent
AND
M/s. Lanco Solar Energy [Pvt ][Ltd, Lanco House, Plot ][No.4, ][Software Units ][Layout,]Madhapur, HYDERABAD-soo [081. (PAN ][No. ][AABCL 7372G)]
...RespondenUAppellant
lA NO: 2 OF 2019
Petition under Section 15'1 CPC praying that in the circumstances statedin the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased tosuspend the order lN S.A. No.'16lHyd/2019 in tTA No. 670/Hyd/2017 of thelncome Tax Appellate Tribunal, Hyderabad Bench "8", at Hyderabad, dated 13-02-2019, pending disposal of the appeal.
Counsel for the Appellant: SRI J.V. PRASAD, Sr Standing Counsel for lncomeTax
Counsel for the Respondent: M/s. MN ADVOCATES
The Court delivered the following: JUDGMENT
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE P.SAM KOSHY
AND
TI{E HON'BLE SRI WSTICE A. LAXMI NARAYANA
I.T.T.A. No. 35O of 20L9
JUDGMENT:peI Hon'bte Si Jltstice p.SAM KOSHy)
Learned counsel appearing for tJle parties submit that the matter has
become infructuous.
2. As the appeal itself since been stated to have become infructuous, theITTA is dismissed as infructuous. No order as to costs.
3Consequently, miscella-neous petitions pending, if any, shall standclosedclosed
Sd/.B.S.CHIRANJEEVIJOINT REGISTRAR@SECTION OFFICER
//TRUE COPY//
To,1. The lncometax [Appellate Tribunal, Hyderabad ][Bench ][' ][B' Hyderabad]i. f6" n..istrnt [Commissioner of lncome Tax, Circle-16(1)'Hyderabad]a. fne Oeputy [Commissioner of lncome-Tax, (Transfer Pricing Officer)-3']Hyderabad4. o,n; cc to [J.v. ][PRASAD, ][sc ][FoR ][lNcoME ] [[oPUC]]5 One CC [M/s. ] [ ]6. Two CD CoPieskam
b
HIGH COURT
DATED:0210812023
JUDGMENT
ITTA.No.350 of 2019
ITTA IS DISMISSEDAS INFRUCTUOUSI
Sa
(
A$s\I*q'
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.