Itta/351/2008 Of G.ramanlal v. Income Tax Officer
High Court
12 Aug 2021 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · taphc
Parties
Itta/351/2008 Of G.ramanlal v. Income Tax Officer
Date of order
12 Aug 2021
Assessment year(s)
2000-2001
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Itta/351/2008 Of G.ramanlal v. Income Tax Officer, the High Court (2021) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Decision: In thar view of the matter, this appeal is dismissed as withdrawn.No costs.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
HIGH COURT FOR AT HYDERABAD
THURSDAY, THE TWELFTH TWO THOUSAND AND
PRESENTTHE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE [A.RAJASHEKER ] ANDTHE HONOURABLE [DT' ]
LT.T.A. NO: 351 OF 2008
lncome Tax Tribunal [Appeal ][under ][section ][260-4 of ][the ][lncome ][Tax ][Act, ][1961']against the order of [the ][income ][Tax ][Appellate Tribunal, Hyderabad ][Bench'A', ][Bench]Hyderabad in ITA No.948/Hydt2007, [for ][assessment year 2000-2001 dated 29-08-2008]received by appellant on [2-9-2008 preferred against ][the ][Order ][of the ][Commissioner ][of]lncome Tax [(Appeals)-Vl, ][3d ][Floor, ][Aayakar Bhavan, Basheerbagh, Hyderabad, Appeal]No.0162/0607/lT0/ [wD.11 ][(a)/hyd /clT(A)-vl/2007-08 ][dated ][10-07-2007, ][preferred]against the order of [the ][lncome ][Tax ][Officer, ][ward-'l1(4), ][Hyderabad 31-03-2006 PAN/]GIR No. [dated 31.03.2000]
Between:
G.Ramanlal, [Prop:Balaji Jewellers, ][748, ][AS Rao Nagar, Hyderabad']
.,,APPELLANT
AND
lncome Tax Officer, [Ward ][- ][11 ]t4l, [Hyderabad' ][lT ][Towers' ] [Gaurds' ][Hyderabad]
...RESPONDENT
For the Appellant [: ] [C.V.NARASIMHAM' ][Advocate]
For the Respondent [: SRI ][B.NARASIMHA SARMA' ][Advocate]
The Court made [the ][following: ORDER]
t
\
HONOTIR.{BLE SRI JUSTICE A. RAJASHEKER REDDYAND
HONOURABLE DT.JUSTICE SHAMEEN,I AKTHER
I.T.T.A. No.351 O F 2008
JUDGMENT i (pet Hon,bte Sri Justice a, Rajashek& Redrrdy)
Learned counsel for the appellant has a filed a letter seekingwithdrawal of this appeal on the ground that the appellanr wishes to availthe berrefits under the Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Act, 2020,withdrawal of this appeal on the ground that the appellanr wishes to availthe berrefits under the Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Act, 2020,introduced by the Central Govemment.
2. In thar view of the matter, this appeal is dismissed as withdrawn.No costs.
3. Pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall also stand
dismissed.
Sd/-M,SANTHI JOINT REGISTRARt'+tSECTION OFFICER
,TRUE COPY//
ToTribunal' Hyderabad A Bench' HyderabadTribunal' Hyderabad A Bench' Hyderabad . 1The Chairman, lncome Tax Appellate [[Bhavan,]][[Bhavan,]]
, iii; 6;;;i;sibneior [rncome-fax ][(Appeats)-Vl ][3rd ][Floor, Aayakar ][[Bhavan,]]
2
Basheerbagh, [HYderabad-500004']
iaa;i: ' [lxi ]".1% 9xi:?:#.T3.1'i f J;iI3,T?3i11 e 1 ..[[(oPUC)]][[(oPUC)]]
3
4
e 1 ... 6;; dc ii [5ii ][s.Nirrti.ha ][Sarma, Advocate ][[(oPUC)]]
567[. ]. [Two ]One [CD CoPies]SPare [CoPY]s. d.,
HIGH COURT
DATED:1210812021
5[1A1 ][E][ OA]\4O)!,\qlso1t*io'/,1,,.I a.':j)''\\.:'-:.
JUDGMENTITTA.No.351 [of ][2008]
the [Appeal ][as ][withdrawn']Dismissing
q]
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.