Itta/352/2013 Of Satish Kumar Agarwal v. The Dy Commissioner Of Income Tax
High Court
30 Aug 2013 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · taphc
Parties
Itta/352/2013 Of Satish Kumar Agarwal v. The Dy Commissioner Of Income Tax
Date of order
30 Aug 2013
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Itta/352/2013 Of Satish Kumar Agarwal v. The Dy Commissioner Of Income Tax, the High Court (2013) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Decision: The appeal is accordingly dismissed.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
PRESENT
THE HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SRI KALYAN JYOTISENGUPTA AND
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE K.C. BHANU
INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL APPEAL NO.352 OF 2013
DATED:30.8.2013
Between:
Satish Kumar Agarwal … Appellant
And
The Dy. Commissioner of Income TaxCircle 5(3), Aayakar BhavanHyderabad … Respondent
THE HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SRI KALYAN JYOTISENGUPTA AND
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE K.C. BHANU
I.T.T.A. NO.352 OF 2013
JUDGMENT:(per the Hon’ble the Chief Justice Sri Kalyan Jyoti Sengupta)
In view of the judgment rendered by us today in I.T.T.A. No.351of 2013, we do not want to write separate judgment in this appeal andwe follow the same judgment, as the issue raised is identical.
Therefore, the judgment rendered in I.T.T.A. No.351 of 2013 willfollow in this matter also.
The appeal is accordingly dismissed. There will be no order asto costs.
________________________
K.J. SENGUPTA, CJ
______________________
K.C. BHANU, J
30.8.2013
bnr
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue