Case Law › High Court › Itta/353/2013 Of Sri Purushottam Das Aga...

Itta/353/2013 Of Sri Purushottam Das Agarwal v. Income-Tax-Officer

High Court 30 Aug 2013 In favour of: Revenue

Forum / Bench

High Court · taphc

Parties

Date of order

30 Aug 2013

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Dismissed

Case summary

In Itta/353/2013 Of Sri Purushottam Das Agarwal v. Income-Tax-Officer, the High Court (2013) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Decision: The appeal is accordingly dismissed.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) PRESENT THE HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SRI KALYAN JYOTISENGUPTA AND THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE K.C. BHANU INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL APPEAL NO.353 OF 2013 DATED:30.8.2013 Between: Purushottam Das Agarwal … Appellant And Income Tax OfficerWard 5(3), Aayakar BhavanHyderabad … Respondent THE HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SRI KALYAN JYOTISENGUPTA AND THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE K.C. BHANU I.T.T.A. NO.353 OF 2013 JUDGMENT:(per the Hon’ble the Chief Justice Sri Kalyan Jyoti Sengupta) In view of the judgment rendered by us today in I.T.T.A. No.351of 2013, we do not want to write separate judgment in this appeal andwe follow the same judgment, as the issue raised is identical. Therefore, the judgment rendered in I.T.T.A. No.351 of 2013 willfollow in this matter also. The appeal is accordingly dismissed. There will be no order asto costs. ________________________ K.J. SENGUPTA, CJ ______________________ K.C. BHANU, J 30.8.2013 bnr

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.