Case LawHigh Court › Itta/354/2008 Of G.ramanlal v. The Incom...

Itta/354/2008 Of G.ramanlal v. The Income Tax Officer

High Court 12 Aug 2021 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · taphc
Parties
Itta/354/2008 Of G.ramanlal v. The Income Tax Officer
Date of order
12 Aug 2021
Assessment year(s)
2003-2004
Outcome
Dismissed

Case summary

In Itta/354/2008 Of G.ramanlal v. The Income Tax Officer, the High Court (2021) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Decision: NARASIMHA ] The Court delivered the [following: ] HONOT]RABLE [A' RAJASHEKER ] AND TIONOI]RABLE [DT.JUSTTCE ] [AKTHIiR] T.T.T.,Nos4 0F 20[8] JUDGMENT [i ][(Per ][Hon'bte ] [Justice ][a' ][Rajasheker Redddv)] Learned [counsel ][for ][the ][appellant ][has ][a ][filed ][a ][letter ][seeking]withdrawal...

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT FORAT HYJ#EABIITE THURSDAY, THE TWELFTH DAY OF AUGUSTTWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY ONE-- PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRIJUSTICE A.RAJASHEKER REDDYANDTHE HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE SHAMEEM AKTHER INCOME TAX TRIBUN AL APPEAL NO: 354 OF 2008 lncome Tax Tribunar Appear under Section 260 of the rncome Tax Act, againstthe order of the lncome Tax Appeilate Tribunar, Hyderabad Bench ,A,, Hyderabad inlrA.No.951/Hyd/2007,1or assessment year 2003-2004 dated 29.08.2008 reached bythe Appellant on 02.09.2008 preferred against the order of the commissioner of lncomeTax Appeals-Vl, 3'd Floor, Aayakar Bhavan, Basheerbagh, Hyderabad-500004, Appealthe order of the lncome Tax Appeilate Tribunar, Hyderabad Bench ,A,, Hyderabad inlrA.No.951/Hyd/2007,1or assessment year 2003-2004 dated 29.08.2008 reached bythe Appellant on 02.09.2008 preferred against the order of the commissioner of lncomeTax Appeals-Vl, 3'd Floor, Aayakar Bhavan, Basheerbagh, Hyderabad-500004, AppealNo.0165/06-07/lroMd.11(a)/Hyd/ctr(A)-vt-2007-2008 dated i0.07.2007, preferredagainst the Order of the lncome Tax Officer, Ward [.i1 ](4), Hyderabad pAN/GlR No. dated 31 .03.2003.against the Order of the lncome Tax Officer, Ward [.i1 ](4), Hyderabad pAN/GlR No. dated 31 .03.2003. Between: G. Ramanlal, Prop: Balaji Jewellers, Olo.748, AS Rao Nagar, Hyderabad. ..,APPELLANT AND The lncome Tax Officer, Ward [- ]11 [4] [Hyderabad, ][lT ][Towers, AC ][Gaurds,]Hyderabad ,..RESPONDENT Counsel for the Appellant: SRI [C. ][V' ] Counsel for the Respondent: [B. NARASIMHA ] The Court delivered the [following: ] HONOT]RABLE [A' RAJASHEKER ] AND TIONOI]RABLE [DT.JUSTTCE ] [AKTHIiR] T.T.T.,Nos4 0F 20[8] JUDGMENT [i ][(Per ][Hon'bte ] [Justice ][a' ][Rajasheker Redddv)] Learned [counsel ][for ][the ][appellant ][has ][a ][filed ][a ][letter ][seeking]withdrawal [ot ][this ][appeal ][on the ground that the appellant wishes ][to avail]the benefits [under ][the ][Direct ][Tax ][Vivad ][Se Vishwas ][Act' ][2020']introduced by [the ][Central Government'] In that view of [the matter, ][this ][appeal ][is dismissed ][as ][withdrawn']2, No costs \ To, 3. Pending miscellaneous [petitions, ][if ][any, shall also ][stand]dismissed. SDi.M,SANTHI JOINT REGISTRAR(i, //TRUE COPY/i SECTION 1. The Chairman, [lncome Tax Appellate Tribunal ]['A' Bench' ][Hyderabad'] 2. The Commissioner [of lncome Tax, Appeal-Vl, ][3'd ][floor' ][Aayakar Bhavan']Basheerbagh, [HYderabad.]Basheerbagh, [HYderabad.] 3.ThelncomeTaxOfficer,Wardll(4),l.T.Towers,ACGuards'Hyderabad' 4. One CC to Sri [C. ]V. [Narasimham, Advocate ]IOPUC] 5. One CC to Sri B. [Narasimha Sarma, Advocate ] 6. Two CD Copies 7. One Spare Copy obrU HIGH DATED: [12lABl2021] JUDGMENTITTA.No.354 [of ][2008] DISMISSING THE APPEALAS WITHDRAWN E I{o1<?va,j25 [Auc20t1].,,'-,*r i,i's{ll-r1-
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan