Itta/356/2016 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax-Vi v. M/S. M.a.basith Khan And Others
High Court
27 Aug 2016 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · taphc
Parties
Itta/356/2016 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax-Vi v. M/S. M.a.basith Khan And Others
Date of order
27 Aug 2016
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Allowed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Itta/356/2016 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax-Vi v. M/S. M.a.basith Khan And Others, the High Court (2016) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE V.RAMASUBRAMANIANAND
HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE G.SHYAM PRASAD
I.T.T.A. M.P. No.42 of 2016in/andI.T.T.A.No.356 of 2016
Judgment:
ITTA MP No.42 of 2016:
It is stated by the learned Standing Counsel for the Departmentthat the conditional order dated 30-6-2016 has been complied with, bysending the amount by post. The learned Standing Counsel hasproduced proof. We accept the same. Therefore, the application isallowed. Delay condoned.
ITTA No.356 of 2016:
2. Office to number. The monetary effect of this appeal isadmittedly within the ceiling limit prescribed by Circular No.21/2015,dated 10-12-2015. The case is not covered by any one of theexceptions in para 8 of the Circular. Therefore, the appeal isdismissed as withdrawn. The miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in this appeal shall stand closed. No costs.
___________________________
V.RAMASUBRAMANIAN, J.
27[th] August, 2016.Ak
___________________________
G.SHYAM PRASAD,J.
HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE V.RAMASUBRAMANIANANDHON’BLE SRI JUSTICE G.SHYAM PRASAD
I.T.T.A. M.P. No.42 of 2016in/andin/andI.T.T.A.No.356 of 2016
27[th] August, 2016.(Ak)(Ak)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.