Case LawHigh Court › Itta/356/2016 Of The Commissioner Of Inc...

Itta/356/2016 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax-Vi v. M/S. M.a.basith Khan And Others

High Court 27 Aug 2016 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · taphc
Parties
Itta/356/2016 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax-Vi v. M/S. M.a.basith Khan And Others
Date of order
27 Aug 2016
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Allowed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Itta/356/2016 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax-Vi v. M/S. M.a.basith Khan And Others, the High Court (2016) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE V.RAMASUBRAMANIANAND HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE G.SHYAM PRASAD I.T.T.A. M.P. No.42 of 2016in/andI.T.T.A.No.356 of 2016 Judgment: ITTA MP No.42 of 2016: It is stated by the learned Standing Counsel for the Departmentthat the conditional order dated 30-6-2016 has been complied with, bysending the amount by post. The learned Standing Counsel hasproduced proof. We accept the same. Therefore, the application isallowed. Delay condoned. ITTA No.356 of 2016: 2. Office to number. The monetary effect of this appeal isadmittedly within the ceiling limit prescribed by Circular No.21/2015,dated 10-12-2015. The case is not covered by any one of theexceptions in para 8 of the Circular. Therefore, the appeal isdismissed as withdrawn. The miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in this appeal shall stand closed. No costs. ___________________________ V.RAMASUBRAMANIAN, J. 27[th] August, 2016.Ak ___________________________ G.SHYAM PRASAD,J. HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE V.RAMASUBRAMANIANANDHON’BLE SRI JUSTICE G.SHYAM PRASAD I.T.T.A. M.P. No.42 of 2016in/andin/andI.T.T.A.No.356 of 2016 27[th] August, 2016.(Ak)(Ak)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan