Case LawHigh Court › Itta/357/2008 Of G.ramanlal v. Income Ta...

Itta/357/2008 Of G.ramanlal v. Income Tax Officer

High Court 12 Aug 2021 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · taphc
Parties
Itta/357/2008 Of G.ramanlal v. Income Tax Officer
Date of order
12 Aug 2021
Assessment year(s)
2000-200
Outcome
Dismissed

Case summary

In Itta/357/2008 Of G.ramanlal v. Income Tax Officer, the High Court (2021) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Decision: In that vieu' of the matter, this appeal is dismissed as withdrawn.No costs.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANAAT HYDERABAD THURSDAY, THE TWELFTH DAY OF AUGUSTTWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY ONE PRESENTTHE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE A.RAJASHEKER REDDYANDTHE HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE SHAMEEM AKTHER I.T.T.A. NO: 357 0F 2008 lncome Tax Tribunal Appeal under Section 260 of the lncome Tax Act, againstthe order of the lncome Tax Appellate Tribunal, Hyderabad Bench [,A, ]Hyderabad in lrANo.993/Hyd/2007 for assessment year 2000-200i dated 29-8-2008 received byappellant 2-9-2008 preferred against the order of the commissioner of lncome Tax(Appeals)- VI, 3'd Floor, Aayakar Bhavan, Basheerbagh, Hyderabad -500004 AppealNo.0162/06-07llrol wd.11(4)/ Hyd /ctr(A) vl2oo7-o| dated 10t07t2007 preferredagainst the order of the lncome Tax officer, ward-1 1(4), Hyderabad pAN/ GIRNo. dated 31 -03-2000 Between: G.Ramanlal, Prop:Balaji Jewellers, T4B, AS Rao Nagar, Hyderabad. ...APPELLANT AND lncome Tax Officer, Ward - 11 l4l, Hyderabad lT Towers, AC Gaurds, Hyderabad ...RESPONDENT For the Appellant : SRI C.V.NARASIMHAM, Advocate For the Respondent : SRI B.NARASIMHA SARMA, Advocate The Court made the following: ORDER HONOURAT}LE SRI JUSTICE A. RAJASHEKER REDDYAND HONO,UI1ABLE DT.JUSTICE SHAMEEM AKTHT]R LT.T.A. No.357 OF 2008 JUDGMENT: / Per Hon'hle Sri Juslice A, Rajasheker Redddy) Learned counsel for the appellant has a filed a letter seeking',vithdrawai of this appeal on the [ground ]that the appellant wishes to availthe benefits r.rnder the Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Act,, 2020,introduced by the Central Govemment. 2. In that vieu' of the matter, this appeal is dismissed as withdrawn.No costs. 3. Pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall also stand dismissed. Sd/.M.SANTHI VARDHANIJOINT REGISTRAR ,TRUE COPY// \ SECTION OFFICER To1. The Chairman, lncome Tax Appellate. Tribunal, Bench 'A' Hyderabad.2. The Commissioner of lncome Tax, 3'd Floor, Aayakar Bhavan, Basheerbagh,Hyderabad.1. The Chairman, lncome Tax Appellate. Tribunal, Bench 'A' Hyderabad.2. The Commissioner of lncome Tax, 3'd Floor, Aayakar Bhavan, Basheerbagh,Hyderabad. 3. The lncome Tax Officer V1lard-1 1(4). Hvderabad. 4. One CC to Sri C.V.Narasihham, Advocate (OPUC) 5. One CC to Sri B.Narasimha Sarma, Advocate (OPUC) 6. Two CD Copies 7. One Spare Copy Y')e; HIGH COURTDATED:12l08/2021 JUDGMENTITTA.No.357 of 2008 t DISMISSING THE APPEAL AS WITHDRAWN. a-\t S1.,.IE oooo25 [[t]Bt0?1]), 1n-?.t?
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan