Case LawHigh Court › Itta/357/2019 Of The Principal Commissio...

Itta/357/2019 Of The Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax - 1 v. M/S. A.p. Beverages Corporation Ltd

High Court 18 Oct 2023 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · taphc
Parties
Itta/357/2019 Of The Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax - 1 v. M/S. A.p. Beverages Corporation Ltd
Date of order
18 Oct 2023
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Other

Case summary

In Itta/357/2019 Of The Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax - 1 v. M/S. A.p. Beverages Corporation Ltd, the High Court (2023) decided the matter.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

i t I IIN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANAII ATHYDERABADIWEDNESDAY, THE EIGHTEENTH DAY OF OCTOBERIi TWOTHOUSANDANDTWENTYTHREE IjI PRESENT [ [3386 ]] THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE P.SAM KOSHYANDTHE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE LAXMI NARAYANA ALISHETW I.T.T.A.N :357 of19 lncome Tax Tribunal Appeal Under Section 260-4 of the lncome Tax Act, 1961arising out 3r tn" brd., of the rncome-tax Appeilate Tribunar, Hyderabad Bench ,A ,arising out 3r tn" brd., of the rncome-tax Appeilate Tribunar, Hyderabad Bench ,A ,Hyderabad] in trA No.878/Hydl2o18, for assessmen t yeat 2014-15 dated 29-01-2ot9 prefe#ed aglinst the order of the commissioner of Income Tax (Appears)-1,2ot9 prefe#ed aglinst the order of the commissioner of Income Tax (Appears)-1,7rh Floor, Rt-Abck! lncome Tax Towers, A.C.Guards, Hyderabad - 500004, AppealNo.0410/ clr(A)-1rHydr2o16-17r2017-18, dared:22-12-2017, preferred against theNo.0410/ clr(A)-1rHydr2o16-17r2017-18, dared:22-12-2017, preferred against theOrder of ttie Defluty Commissioner of lncome Tax Cirlce_1(1), Hyderabad, GIRNo.AABCA7385Al dated 3o_1 2-201 6.No.AABCA7385Al dated 3o_1 2-201 6. Between: The Principal Commissioner of lncome Tax - 1, Hyderabad ...Appellant AND MIs. A.PBeverages Corporation Ltd., M.J. Road, Nampally, Hyderabad jII...RespondentIIIj Counsel foithe Appellant: SRt J.V. PRASAD (Sr. SC FOR TNCOME T AX) Counsel for the Respondent: SRI y. RATNAKARThe Court delivered the following: JUDGMENTThe Court delivered the following: JUDGMENT I THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE P.SAM KOSHY AND THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE LAXMI NARAYANA ALISHETTY I.T.T.A. No. 357 of 2Ol9 JUDGMENT: (pt'r tktt tte.s,1 ../r/.\Ir.., P. S,4ll, XOsIIr./ Today, when the matter is taken up lor hearing, it has beeninformed to this Cotrrt that the Assessing Olficer itself h:rs passed afinal order and nothing further remains to be adjudicated rrpon in thepresent appeal. 2. Considerir-rg t 1.re subsequent developments that have beentranspired, this Appcal stands disposed o[. No order as to (.osts. Miscellaneous applications, i[ any pending, shall stzrnd closed.There shall be no ordcr as to costs.There shall be no ordcr as to costs. SD/- B.S.CHIRANJEEVIJOINT REGISTRAR.it.'SECTIOTIbFFlcER /ffRUE COPY// To, 1The lncome-tax Appellate Tribunal, Hyderabad Bench 'A ' Hyderabad.2The Commissioner of lncome Tax (Appeals)-1, 7h Floor, A-Block, lncome TaxTowdrs, A.C.Guards, Hyderabad - 500004.2The Commissioner of lncome Tax (Appeals)-1, 7h Floor, A-Block, lncome TaxTowdrs, A.C.Guards, Hyderabad - 500004.3The Deputy Commissioner of lncome Tax Cirlce-1(1), Hyderabad4OnecC to SRI J.V. PRASAD (Sr. SC FOR INCOME TAX) 5OnebC to SRI Y. RATNAKAR , Advocate [OPUCI6TwobD Co'pies4OnecC to SRI J.V. PRASAD (Sr. SC FOR INCOME TAX) 5OnebC to SRI Y. RATNAKAR , Advocate [OPUCI6TwobD Co'pies kamNS${x HIGH COURTPSK. J Ir-nra,.lf onreolr 8l'1012023 iI{IJUDGENT,rro.*1.. s;l * 2o1sIIIIiI!ttIi*ltDISPOSING OFPEAL IG s-IA [iE ]o-i\9c<'ri- [$tt ][Ti8].:),t]).14'/'ri[< ]DE:1PI
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan