Case LawHigh Court › Itta/358/2013 Of Commissioner Of Income...

Itta/358/2013 Of Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Vani Educational Society

High Court 23 Aug 2013 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · taphc
Parties
Itta/358/2013 Of Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Vani Educational Society
Date of order
23 Aug 2013
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

Case summary

In Itta/358/2013 Of Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Vani Educational Society, the High Court (2013) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Decision: On that ground alone, this appeal is dismissed with libertyto the appellant to file fresh appeal within four weeks from date.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

THE HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SRI KALYAN JYOTI SENGUPTA AND THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE K.C. BHANU I.T.T.A. No.358 OF 2013 DATED:23.8.2013 Between:The Commissioner of Income Tax,Tirupathi. … Appellant And Vani Educational Society,Chittoor. ….Respondent THE HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SRI KALYAN JYOTI SENGUPTA AND THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE K.C. BHANU I.T.T.A. No.358 OF 2013 Judgment:(per the Hon’ble the Chief Justice Sri Kalyan Jyoti Sengupta) The certified copy annexed to the appeal is underlined bysome person other than the Court. A fresh certified copy has tobe annexed without any underlining. On that ground alone, this appeal is dismissed with libertyto the appellant to file fresh appeal within four weeks from date. We do not appreciate filing of marked certified copy andthe certified copy should be furnished virgin and should not beunderlined or touched by any person except by the Court after itis filed. ___________________ K.J. SENGUPTA, CJ ____________ K.C. BHANU, J 21.8.2013
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan