Itta/358/2014 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax (Central) v. M/S. Amr India Ltd
High Court
12 Jun 2014 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · taphc
Parties
Itta/358/2014 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax (Central) v. M/S. Amr India Ltd
Date of order
12 Jun 2014
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Itta/358/2014 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax (Central) v. M/S. Amr India Ltd, the High Court (2014) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: Hence, the appeal is dismissed.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT HYDERABADFOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AND THE STATE OF ANDHRAPRADESH
THE HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SRI KALYAN JYOTI SENGUPTA AND THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR
AND
I.T.T.A. No. 358 of 2014
Date: 12.06.2014
Between:
The Commissioner of Income Tax (Central),Hyderabad.
… Appellant
And
M/s. AMR India Limited(formerly AMR Constructions Limited)Plot No.88, Sarikonda Mansion,Kamalapuri Colony, Hyderabad.
… Respondent
This Court made the following:
THE HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SRI KALYAN JYOTI SENGUPTAANDTHE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR
I.T.T.A. No. 358 of 2014
JUDGMENT:(Per the Hon’ble The Chief Justice Sri Kalyan Jyoti Sengupta)
We have heard Sri J.V. Prasad, learned counsel for the appellant,and gone through the impugned judgment and order of the learnedTribunal.
It appears that the learned Tribunal found on fact that aftercompletion of assessment proceedings and after reaching finalitythereon, the Assessing Officer tried to reagitate the assessments. According to us, the learned Tribunal has rightly held that the AssessingOfficer has no jurisdiction to reagitate the assessments which werealready completed and subsisting. We therefore do not find any elementof law to be decided in this appeal.
Hence, the appeal is dismissed. There will be no order as tocosts.
___________________
K.J. SENGUPTA, CJ
___________________
SANJAY KUMAR, J
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.