Itta/358/2017 Of Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S. K. Venkataraju

THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTI CE SANJAY KUMAR AND THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTI CE GUDI SEVA SHYAM PRASAD I .T.T.A. No. 358 of 2017 ORDER: This appeal by the Revenue under Section 260-A of the Income Tax Act, 1961, raises the following substantial question of law. “In the facts and circumstances of the case, whether the Hon’ble Tribunal (ITAT) is correct in law in condoning the delay in filing the appeal before the learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), without due appreciation of relevant facts and reasons mentioned in the orders of the learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) and when the reasons quoted by the Respondent-assessee found to be wrong and unverifiable to condone the said delay?” 2. Perusal of the record however reflects that the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Visakhapatnam Bench, found on facts that sufficient cause had been made out for the delay in filing of the appeal before the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) and that condonation of the same was justified. This discretion exercised by the Tribunal was purely on the factual aspects of the case. 3. We therefore find no question of law, much less a substantial question of law, arising for consideration in this appeal. 4. The appeal is accordingly dismissed. Pending miscellaneous petitions shall also stand dismissed. No order as to costs. ________________ SANJAY KUMAR, J ___________________________ GUDI SEVA SHYAM PRASAD, J KSM THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTI CE SANJAY KUMAR AND THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTI CE GUDI SEVA SHYAM PRASAD I .T.T.A. No. 358 of 2017 13[th] June, 2017