Case LawHigh Court › Itta/360/2008 Of G.ramanlal v. Thee Inco...

Itta/360/2008 Of G.ramanlal v. Thee Income Tax Officer

High Court 12 Aug 2021 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · taphc
Parties
Itta/360/2008 Of G.ramanlal v. Thee Income Tax Officer
Date of order
12 Aug 2021
Assessment year(s)
2003-2004
Outcome
Dismissed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Itta/360/2008 Of G.ramanlal v. Thee Income Tax Officer, the High Court (2021) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Decision: In that vierv of the matter, this appeal is dismissed as withdrawn.No costs.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANAAT HYDERABAD THURSDAY, THE TWELFTH DAY OF AUGUSTTWO THOUS,AND AND TWENTY ONE PRESENT- THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE A.RAJASHEKER REDDYANDTHE HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE SHAMEEM AKTHER I.T.T.A. NO: 360 oF 2008 lncome Tax Tribunar Appear under Section 260 of the rncome Tax Act, againstthe order of the lncome Tax Appeilate Tribunar, Hyderabad Bench ,A, Hyderabad in rrANo.996/Hyd/2007 for assessment year 2003-2004 dated 29-8-2ooB preferred againstthe order of the commissioner of lncome Tax (Appeals)-Vl, 3d floor, Aayakar Bhavan,Basheerbagh, Hvderabad -5o0oo4 Appear No.0165/06-07/ rro/Wd.11 (4)/ Hyd /crr(A)vl/2007-08 dated 31/5/2006 prefened against the order of the lncome Tax officer.Ward-1 1(4), Hyderabad PAN/GtR No.ACWpG4406E dated 31-03_2006 Between: G,Ramanlal, Prop:Balaji Jewellers, T4B, AS Rao Nagar, Hyderabad ,..APPELLANT AND The lncome Tax Officer, Ward - 11 [4], lT Towers, AC Gaurds, Hyderabad ...RESPONDENT For the Appellant : SRI C.V.NARASIMHAM, AdvocateFor the Respondent : SRI B.NARASIMHA SARMA, Advocate The Court made the following: ORDER To HONOUIIABLE SRI JUSTICE A. RAJASHEKER REDDYAND HONI]T. RABLE DT.JUSTICE SHAMEEM AKTHER I.T.T.A. No.360 OF 2008 JUDGMENT | (Per Hon'bte Sti Justice a. Rajasheker Re.!ddy) Leamed counsel for the appellant has a filed a letter seekingwithdrawal of'this appeal on the ground that the appellant wishes to availthe benefits under the Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Act, 2020,introduced by the Central Govemment.withdrawal of'this appeal on the ground that the appellant wishes to availthe benefits under the Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Act, 2020,introduced by the Central Govemment. 2. In that vierv of the matter, this appeal is dismissed as withdrawn.No costs. 3. Pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall also standdismissed Sd/.M,SANTHI VARDHANIJOINT REGISTRAR,TRUE COPY//( -a!: [-t ]t-'-SECTION OFFICER 1. The Chairman, lncome Tax Appellate. Trlbunal, Bench 'A' Hyderabad.2. The Commissioner of lncome Tax, 3'o Floor, Aayakar Bhavan, Basheerbagh,Hyderabad. 1.2. The Commissioner of lncome Tax, 3'o Floor, Aayakar Bhavan, Basheerbagh,Hyderabad. 1.3. One cc to the lncome Tax Officer, Ward ['1 ]1(4), Hyderabad. 4. One CC to Sri C.V.Narasimham, Advocate (OPUC) 5. One CC to Sri B.Narasimha Sarma, Advocate (OPUC) 6. Two CD Copies 7. One Spare CopyKjKjd HIGH DATED'.1210812021 ORDERITTA.No.360 of 2008 t DISMISSING THE ITTA AS WITHDRAWN. n> d'"z;\il..)oIo25 [AlJ6t$?1 ]?\.A-i\*DEsra.Jc$
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan