Case LawHigh Court › Itta/360/2019 Of The Principal Commissio...

Itta/360/2019 Of The Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax-2 v. M/S. Ijm (India) Infrastructure Ltd

High Court 19 Jul 2021 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · taphc
Parties
Itta/360/2019 Of The Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax-2 v. M/S. Ijm (India) Infrastructure Ltd
Date of order
19 Jul 2021
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

Case summary

In Itta/360/2019 Of The Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax-2 v. M/S. Ijm (India) Infrastructure Ltd, the High Court (2021) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE H'GH COURT FOR AT HYDTJREABIITE MONDAY, THE NINErwo iHo i Ee iE li,illl, p,tl*, " PRESENT SRI JIrH E Ho No u R^r,-. r'-ilrB:I:' lm"Jffi:: [*"]rH E Ho No u R^r,-. r'-ilrB:I:' lm"Jffi:: [*"] THE HONOURABLE SRI JI lNcoMETAXTRIB UNAL APP EAL NO:3600F20't9 lncome Tax Tribunar Appear Under lrA the No order 1731/Hyd 12016 of the rncome for Tax Appeilate Assessment Tribunar, year section 260 0f 2011-2012 Hyderabad the dated ,8, rncome Tax Bench, 27.03.2019 Hyderabad Act, preferredagainstinlrA the No order 1731/Hyd 12016 of the rncome for Tax Appeilate Assessment Tribunar, year section 260 0f 2011-2012 Hyderabad the dated ,8, rncome Tax Bench, 27.03.2019 Hyderabad Act, preferredagainstinagainst the order of the commissioner of rncome Tax (A)-2 Hyderabad, AppealNo 10005/2017-18 clr(A)-2 dated 20.12.2018 preferred against the order of theDeputy commissioner of rncome Tax, PAN/GrR No.AAAC170674 dated 28.03.2015.Between:No 10005/2017-18 clr(A)-2 dated 20.12.2018 preferred against the order of theDeputy commissioner of rncome Tax, PAN/GrR No.AAAC170674 dated 28.03.2015.Between: The Principal Commissioner of lncome Tax_2, Hyderabad ...APPELLANT/APPELLANT AND 43, Kavuri Hills, Phase-1, Madhapur, M/s IJM (lndla) lnfrastructure Ltd., H. No. Hyderabad1-89/1 , 3rd and 4th Floor, ptot No. 42 and ...RESPONDENT/RESPONDENT Counsel for the Appellant: SMT. K. MAMATA CHOUDARY,Sr. SG FOR I.T. DEPT. Counsel for the Respondent: -- The Court delivered the following: JUDGMENT HONOURABLE [M'S'RAMACHANDRA ] AND HONOURABLE [T' VINOD ] I.T.T,A, [.36][0][ OF][ 2019] JUDGMENT: ^ ^rPur Srr Jnstrce [.\/.S'Ranachandt'a ][Kaat] Ms.K.MamataChowdary,leamedStandingCounselforlncomeTax Department [has ][filed ][a ][letter ][requesting ][to ][permit the ][appellant ][to]withdraw this [Appeal ][on the ][ground ][that the ][respondent ][had ][filed ][an]Application [under ][the ][Direct Tax ][Vivad ][Se ][Vishwas ][Scheme' ][2020 ][with]to [revive ][the ][Appeal ][in ][the ][event ][of ][failure ][of ][satisfactory]Iiberty resolution [r.rnder ][the said ][Scheme.] Heard the learned [counsel ][for ][the ][Appellant']2, -1 Granting liberty as [sought, ][this Appeal ][is dismissed ][as ][withdrawn'] To, 4Pending miscellaneous [petitions, ][if ][any, ][in this ][Appeal shall ][also] stand dismissed. No costs. SD/.M.SANTHI JOINT REGISTRAR(-l')\SECTION ,TRUE COPY// 1. The lncome [Tax Appellate Tribunal, Hyderabad 'B' Bench' Hyderabad'] 2. The Commissioner [of lncome Tax (Appeals)-2' Hyderabad'] 3. The Deputy [Commissioner of lncome Tax, Circle ][2 ][(1)' ][Hyderabad] +. One CC to [Smt. ] [Mamata Choudary' Advocate ][ ] 5Two CD CoPies6One Spare [CoPY]s[br]6One Spare [CoPY]s[br] HIGH COURT DATED: [1910712021] ORDERlTTA.No.360 of [2019] DISMISSING THE APPEALAS WITHDRAWN 1eS ATrEoo03 .i!** Dl-!
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan