Itta/360/2019 Of The Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax-2 v. M/S. Ijm (India) Infrastructure Ltd
High Court
19 Jul 2021 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · taphc
Parties
Itta/360/2019 Of The Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax-2 v. M/S. Ijm (India) Infrastructure Ltd
Date of order
19 Jul 2021
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Itta/360/2019 Of The Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax-2 v. M/S. Ijm (India) Infrastructure Ltd, the High Court (2021) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE H'GH COURT FOR
AT HYDTJREABIITE
MONDAY, THE NINErwo iHo i Ee iE li,illl, p,tl*, "
PRESENT
SRI JIrH E Ho No u R^r,-. r'-ilrB:I:' lm"Jffi:: [*"]rH E Ho No u R^r,-. r'-ilrB:I:' lm"Jffi:: [*"]
THE HONOURABLE SRI JI
lNcoMETAXTRIB UNAL APP EAL NO:3600F20't9
lncome Tax Tribunar Appear Under lrA the No order 1731/Hyd 12016 of the rncome for Tax Appeilate Assessment Tribunar, year section 260 0f 2011-2012 Hyderabad the dated ,8, rncome Tax Bench, 27.03.2019 Hyderabad Act, preferredagainstinlrA the No order 1731/Hyd 12016 of the rncome for Tax Appeilate Assessment Tribunar, year section 260 0f 2011-2012 Hyderabad the dated ,8, rncome Tax Bench, 27.03.2019 Hyderabad Act, preferredagainstinagainst the order of the commissioner of rncome Tax (A)-2 Hyderabad, AppealNo 10005/2017-18 clr(A)-2 dated 20.12.2018 preferred against the order of theDeputy commissioner of rncome Tax, PAN/GrR No.AAAC170674 dated 28.03.2015.Between:No 10005/2017-18 clr(A)-2 dated 20.12.2018 preferred against the order of theDeputy commissioner of rncome Tax, PAN/GrR No.AAAC170674 dated 28.03.2015.Between:
The Principal Commissioner of lncome Tax_2, Hyderabad
...APPELLANT/APPELLANT
AND
43, Kavuri Hills, Phase-1, Madhapur, M/s IJM (lndla) lnfrastructure Ltd., H. No. Hyderabad1-89/1 , 3rd and 4th Floor, ptot No. 42 and
...RESPONDENT/RESPONDENT
Counsel for the Appellant: SMT. K. MAMATA CHOUDARY,Sr. SG FOR I.T. DEPT.
Counsel for the Respondent: --
The Court delivered the following: JUDGMENT
HONOURABLE [M'S'RAMACHANDRA ]
AND
HONOURABLE [T' VINOD ]
I.T.T,A, [.36][0][ OF][ 2019]
JUDGMENT: ^
^rPur Srr Jnstrce [.\/.S'Ranachandt'a ][Kaat]
Ms.K.MamataChowdary,leamedStandingCounselforlncomeTax Department [has ][filed ][a ][letter ][requesting ][to ][permit the ][appellant ][to]withdraw this [Appeal ][on the ][ground ][that the ][respondent ][had ][filed ][an]Application [under ][the ][Direct Tax ][Vivad ][Se ][Vishwas ][Scheme' ][2020 ][with]to [revive ][the ][Appeal ][in ][the ][event ][of ][failure ][of ][satisfactory]Iiberty resolution [r.rnder ][the said ][Scheme.]
Heard the learned [counsel ][for ][the ][Appellant']2,
-1
Granting liberty as [sought, ][this Appeal ][is dismissed ][as ][withdrawn']
To,
4Pending miscellaneous [petitions, ][if ][any, ][in this ][Appeal shall ][also]
stand dismissed. No costs.
SD/.M.SANTHI JOINT REGISTRAR(-l')\SECTION
,TRUE COPY//
1. The lncome [Tax Appellate Tribunal, Hyderabad 'B' Bench' Hyderabad']
2. The Commissioner [of lncome Tax (Appeals)-2' Hyderabad']
3. The Deputy [Commissioner of lncome Tax, Circle ][2 ][(1)' ][Hyderabad]
+. One CC to [Smt. ] [Mamata Choudary' Advocate ][ ]
5Two CD CoPies6One Spare [CoPY]s[br]6One Spare [CoPY]s[br]
HIGH COURT
DATED: [1910712021]
ORDERlTTA.No.360 of [2019]
DISMISSING THE APPEALAS WITHDRAWN
1eS ATrEoo03 .i!** Dl-!
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.