Itta/36/2009 Of Smt. V.jyothi v. Asst. Comnmisisoner Of Incometax

'213447l IN THE HIGH AT HYDERABAD THURSDAY, [THE TWENTY SEVENTH DAY OF ] TWO THOUSAND PRESENT THE HONOURABLE [JUSTICE P.SAM KOSHY]ANDTHE HONOURABLE INCOME [T]AX [Nos][.36 A] [47 ][0F ][2009] INCOME TAX [NO: ][3][6 ][0F ][2009] lncomeTaxTribunalAppealUnderSection2604ofthelncomeTaxAct,,l96.l,grin.i G ord.r [dated ][19_1'2_2008 ][passed ][in tTA No. ][10771HYD12004 ][for ][the]n".."..r"nt [year ][2001_2002 ][on the file ][of ][the ][lncome ][Tax ][Appellate ][Tribunal,]Hyderabad Bench'B', [HYderabad] Between: Smt. V.JYothi, 8-3-966/19, [Nagarjuna]Nagar ColonY, [YellareddYguda,]Hyderabad -500 082. ...Appellant ANDAssistant Comnmisisoner [of ][lncomeTax' ][Circle-6 ][[1] ][Hyderabad] ...Respondent INCOME [N][O: ][47 ] [2009] lncomeTaxTribunalAppealUnderSection2604ofthelncomeTaxACt,l96,iagainsi the order [aatea zd-oz-2009 ][passed ][in ][tTA ][No.873iHYD/2008 ][for ][the]n"r."."r""^t [year ][2004-2005 ][on ][the ][fiie ][of ][the ][lncome ][Tax ][Appellate ][Tribunal,]Hyderabad Bench'B', [HYderabad.] Between: KhorshedShapoorChenai,s-g-22tl,Shapoorwadi'Adarshnagar'Hyderabad-500082 ...Appellant AND Assistant Commissioner [of lncome Tax, Cricle - 5 [1] ]' [Hyderabad] ...Respondent :Sri P Murali [Krii;hna ][(Not Present)] Counsel for the [Appellants in both ][ITTAs] :Sri J V Prasarl Counsel for the [Respondent in both ][ITTAs] (Sr. SC for lnr:ome [l[ax)] The Court delivered [the ][following: ] THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE P.SAM KOSHY AND THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE NARSING RAO NANDIKONDAI.T.T.A.Nos.36 8b 47 OF 2OO9 COMMON JUDGMENT (per Hatl'ble Sn Justice P.Sq.m Koshlj) For the last couple of hearing, these matters are posted under the caption 'for dismissal', however, on some ground or the other, theearlier counsel had been taking time to seek appropriate instructionsfrom the assessee and to file fresh vakalat. 2. It appears that the assessee perhaps is not interested inpursuing these appeals and that is the reason no fresh vakalat hasbeen hled, neither is there any duly engaged counsel representing theSSESSCC. 3. On the ground that the appellalts the ground that the appellalts that the appellalts the appellalts appellalts are not being represented not being represented being represented represented formany occasions, this Bench is left with no other option but to dismissthese appeals for w,ant of prosecution. Accordingly, these appeals aredismissed for non- prosecution. On the ground that the appellalts the ground that the appellalts that the appellalts the appellalts appellalts are not being represented not being represented being represented represented for As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending if any, shallstand closed '.,-* [?'[+*Alt?$[lR] ,/TRUE [COPY'/] secrh#rrrcen To, 1. J4Two [ff:sf ][CD CoPies][*ii:$f,:liH,'.sliE:lfgi{e"":r-'l"l***'o]4Two [ff:sf ][CD CoPies][*ii:$f,:liH,'.sliE:lfgi{e"":r-'l"l***'o] 2 J ADK/PSL[(A-] HIGH COURT DATED:2710312025 COMMON JUDGMENT lTTA.Nos.36 and 47 ot 2009 .,,i;16 t';.:)sEp A6:'+* I)1 DISMISSING THE BOTH ITTA s FORNON.PROSEUCTION 8e6\3 /