Case LawHigh Court › Itta/363/2011 Of Adp Pvt. Ltd v. The Dep...

Itta/363/2011 Of Adp Pvt. Ltd v. The Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax, Hyderabad

High Court 22 Apr 2021 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · taphc
Parties
Itta/363/2011 Of Adp Pvt. Ltd v. The Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax, Hyderabad
Date of order
22 Apr 2021
Assessment year(s)
2004-2005
Outcome
Dismissed

Case summary

In Itta/363/2011 Of Adp Pvt. Ltd v. The Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax, Hyderabad, the High Court (2021) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANAAT HYDERABAD THURSDAY, THE TWENTY SECOND DAY OF APRILTWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY ONE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE M.S.RAMACHANDRA RAOANDTHE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T.VINOD KUMAR l.T.T.A. NO:363 OF 2011 lncome Tax Tribunal Appeal under Section 260-4 of the lncome Tax Act, againstthe order of the lncome Tax Appellate Tribunal, Hyderabad Bench 'A' Hyderabad in ITANo.155/Hyd/2009 for assessment year 2004-2005 daled 251021201 1 preferred againstthe order of the Commissioner of lncome Tax Appeals -ll, Hyderabad AppealNo.lT40061/ClT(A)-lll/08-09 daled 1811112008 preferred against the Order of thelncome Tax Officer Ward -1(2) Hyderabad PAN/GIR No.AAACW 2655ClA-447 dated1811212006. Between: ADP PVT. LTD., 6-3-1091/C/1 Fortune [gTRaj ]Bhavan Road, Hyderabad...APPELLANT AND THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, HYDERABAD, Circte t (1),Hyderabad ...RESPONDENT For the Appellant : SRI CH.PUSHYAM KIRAN, Advocate For the Respondent : SRI K.RAJI REDDY, SR. SC FOR l.T. The Court made the following: ORDER HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE M.S.RAMACHANDRA RAOAND HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T.VINOD KUMAR ITTA.No.363 of 2O11 JUDGMENT: per Si Justice M. S. Ramachand-ra Rao) Counsel for the appellant has filed a Memodt.Og.O4.2027 seeking permission of the Court towithdraw the appeal to settle the matter with theauthorities under Vivaad Se Vishwas Act,2O2O.withdraw the appeal to settle the matter with theauthorities under Vivaad Se Vishwas Act,2O2O. 2. Granting permission as sought for, this Appeal isdismissed as withdrawn. No order as to costs. 3. Consequently, miscelianeous petitions pending, if &ny, shall stand closed. Sd/-K.SREENIVASA RAOJOINT REGISTRARCa)SECTION OFFICER //TRUE COPY' To 1.The lncome Tax Appellate Tribunal, ['B' ]Bench, Hyderabad.2.One CC to Sri Ch.Pushyam Kiran, Advocate [(OPUC)]2.One CC to Sri Ch.Pushyam Kiran, Advocate [(OPUC)]J-One CC to Sri K.Raii Reddy, Advocate [(OPUC)]4.Two CD CopiesKj.9-4.Two CD CopiesKj.9- I DATED:2210412O21 ORDERITTA.No.363 of 2011 DISMISSED AS WITHDRAWN [THE ITTA.] t%&C' -.arr)1oo01d)2tLTo*DE5
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan