Case LawHigh Court › Itta/363/2013 Of Commissioner Of Income...

Itta/363/2013 Of Commissioner Of Income Tax Iii v. M/S. Semantic Space Technologies Limited

High Court 23 Aug 2013 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · taphc
Parties
Itta/363/2013 Of Commissioner Of Income Tax Iii v. M/S. Semantic Space Technologies Limited
Date of order
23 Aug 2013
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

Case summary

In Itta/363/2013 Of Commissioner Of Income Tax Iii v. M/S. Semantic Space Technologies Limited, the High Court (2013) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Decision: Hence, this appeal is also dismissed. ___________________ K.J.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

THE HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SRI KALYAN JYOTI SENGUPTA AND THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE K.C. BHANU I.T.T.A. No.363 OF 2013 DATED:23.8.2013 Between:The Commissioner of Income Tax-III,Hyderabad. … Appellant And Semantic Space Technologies Limited,Hyderabad. ….Respondent THE HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SRI KALYAN JYOTI SENGUPTA ANDTHE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE K.C. BHANU I.T.T.A. No.363 OF 2013 Judgment:(per the Hon’ble the Chief Justice Sri Kalyan Jyoti Sengupta) We have heard Sri B. Narasimha Sarma, learned counsel for theappellant and have gone through the judgment and order of the learnedTribunal It appears, the learned Tribunal has relied on its own decision inM/s. Ushodaya Enterprises Pvt., Ltd., Hyderabad in I.T.A. Nos. 1706 to1708/Hyd/2008, dated 22.3.2012 and an appeal, being I.T.T.A. No. 73 of2013, preferred against the order of the Tribunal in I.T.A.No. 1708/Hyd/2008, has already been dismissed by this Court. Hence, this appeal is also dismissed. ___________________ K.J. SENGUPTA, CJ ____________ K.C. BHANU, J 23.8.2013
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan