In Itta/366/2012 Of P.srinivasa Rao v. Income Tax Officer, Ward-2, Kakinada, the High Court (2013) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Decision: The appeal is accordingly dismissed. ___________________ K.J.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
THE HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SRI KALYAN JYOTI SENGUPTA
AND
THE HON’BLE Ms. JUSTICE G. ROHINI
I.T.T.A.No.366 of 2012
DATED: 19.7.2013
Between:P. Srinivasa Rao … AppellantAndIncome Tax Officer,Kakinada.…. Respondent
THE HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SRI KALYAN JYOTI SENGUPTA
AND
THE HON’BLE Ms. JUSTICE G. ROHINI
I.T.T.A.No.366 OF 2012
Judgment:(per the Hon’ble the Chief Justice Sri Kalyan Jyoti Sengupta)
In view of the judgment rendered by us today in I.T.T.A.No. 357 of 2012, we do not want to write separate judgmentin this appeal and we follow the same judgment, as the issuein fact and law is identical.
Therefore, the judgment rendered in I.T.T.A. No. 357 of2012 will follow in this matter also.
The appeal is accordingly dismissed.
___________________
K.J. SENGUPTA, CJ
_________________
G. ROHINI, J
19.7.2013
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue