Itta/367/2010 Of M/S.janaki Rama Enterprises [P] Ltd v. Dy.commissioner Of Income Tax

HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANAAT HYDERABAD ) THURSDAY, THE TWENTY FIRST DAY OF OCTOBERTWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY ONE PRESENTTHE HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SATISH CHANDRA SHARMAANDTHE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T.AMARNATH GOUD |.A.NO: 1 OF 2021 AND|.T.T.A. NO: 367 OF 2010 |.A.NO.1 0F 2021: Petition under Section 151 of CPC [praying ]that [in ]the circumstances [stated ][in ][the]affidavit filed therewith, the High Court [may ]be [pleased ]to [permit ][the ][Appellant]Company to withdraw the [present ]appeal [for asst. year 2002-03 bearing ITTA No.367 ][of]2010 under the VSV scheme in the [interest ][of justice and be ][pleased ][to ][pass ][such]further or other orQer or orders as the Hon'ble [Court may deem ][fit ][and ][proper ][in ][the]facts and circumstances of the case. rrTA NO.367 0F 2010: lncome Tax Tribunal Appeal under Section [260-4 ][of ][the ][lncome ][Tax ][Act' ][1961 ][,]against the order dated 25lo7l2oo\ [in ITA ][No.735 ][to ][737lHydl2007 ][on the file of ][the]lncome Tax Appellate Tribunal, Hyderabad [Bench ]['A' ][Hyderabad the Assessment Year]2OO1-02 to 2003-2004 [preferred ]against [the ][order ][dated ][914107 ][in Appeal-lll ][No.lTA]No.2B7 to 291tDC2(1) CIT(A)-|ll/06-07 on [the file ][of the ][commissioner ][of ][lncome Tax](Appeals-lll), Hyderabad, preferred against the order dated [2011212006 ][in ] No.AAACJ5217H/J-041 on the file of the [lncome ][Tax ][Officer, Circle ][No.2(1),]Hyderabad. Between: Janakiram Enterprises [P] Ltd., Hyderabad ...PETITIONERYAPPELLANT AND Deputy Commissioner of lncome [Tax, Circle-2 ][1], [Hyderabad] ..,RESPONDENT For the Appellant : SRI Y.RATNAKAR, [Advocate] For the Respondent : NO ONE APPEARED The Court made the following: ORDER \ THE HO,BLECHIEFCESHAND THE HON'BLE SRI [JUSTICE T. AMARNATH][ GOUD] I.A. No. 1 of 2O2lANDI.T.T.ANo,367 of 2OlO COMMON JUDGMENT: (Per the Hoi'ble the ChielJustice [Satish Chond.'a Sharlna)] I.A.No.1 of 2021 [has been ][Iiled for ][withdrawal of the ][present]appeal, as the appellant [has ][approached ][the respondent ][under ][the]Direct Tax Vivad Se [Vishwas ][Scheme, ][2020'] I.A. is al1owed. The appeal [is ][dismissed as ][q'ithdrawn with]liberty to file a fresh appeal [in ][case ][the ][cause ][arises ][in ][future'] Pending miscellaneous [petitions, ][if ][any, shall ][also ][stand]dismissed. There shall be [no order ][as ][to ][costs.] Sd/.tU.SANTHI VARDHANIJOINT REGISTRAR\v./SECTION OFFICER //TRUE COPYII To1.The Chairman, lncome Tax Appellate [Tribunal, Bench ]['A' ][Hyderabad.]2.The Commissioner of lncome Tax [Appeals, ][Hyderabad.] The lncome Tax Officer, Circle [-2(1), Hyderabad.] 3. One CC to Sri Y.Ratnakar, Advocate [(OPUC)] 4.ATwo CD Copies6.One Spare CopyKj. \},=- HIGH COURT DATED:21 [11012021] COMMON JUDGMENT l.A.No.1 ot 2021And lTTA.No.367 o12010 Dismissing the ITTA as withdrawn. \o ) Y\\,[s,-iAT€]o:)oo2$t{x$11k...)i