Itta/367/2015 Of Commissioner Of Income Tax [Tds] v. Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation
High Court
18 Nov 2015 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · taphc
Parties
Itta/367/2015 Of Commissioner Of Income Tax [Tds] v. Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation
Date of order
18 Nov 2015
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Itta/367/2015 Of Commissioner Of Income Tax [Tds] v. Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation, the High Court (2015) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: Following the order of the Division Bench in I.T.T.A.No.665 of 2014 dated26.11.2014 and in terms thereof, this appeal is also dismissed.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE RAMESH RANGANATHAN
And
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE M.SEETHARAMA MURTI
I.T.T.A.No.367 of 2015
ORDER:(per Hon’ble Sri Justice Ramesh Ranganathan)
Against a common order passed in three appeals in I.T.A.Nos.140, 141 and142 of 2014 dated 18.06.2014, Revenue carried the matter in appeal before thisCourt in I.T.T.A.No.665 of 2014 and a Division Bench of this Court, by order dated26.11.2014, dismissed the appeal. The present appeal is preferred against the orderpassed in I.T.A.No.142 of 2014.
Following the order of the Division Bench in I.T.T.A.No.665 of 2014 dated26.11.2014 and in terms thereof, this appeal is also dismissed. Miscellaneouspetitions pending, if any, shall also stand dismissed. There shall be no order as tocosts.
______________________________
RAMESH RANGANATHAN, J
18[th] November, 2015.
____________________________
M.SEETHARAMA MURTI, J
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue