Itta/368/2010 Of M/S.janaki Rama Enterprises [P] Ltd v. Dy.commissioner Of Incometax

HIGH COURT FOR AT HYDERABAD THURSDAY, THE TWENTY TWO THOUSAND AND PRESENTTHE HONOURABLE THE [CHIEF JUSTICE SATISH CHANDRA SHARMA]ANDTHE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE [T,AMARNATH ] I.A.NO: 1 OF 2021 AND I.T.T.A. NO: 368 OF 2010 l.A.NO.1 0F[2][o21:,] Between: Janakiram Enterprises [P] [Ltd., ][Hyderabad] ...PETITIONEFUAPPELLANT AND Deputy Commissioner of [lncome Tax, ][Ctcle'2 ][1], [Hyderabad] ...RESPONDENT Petition under Section ['1 ][51 ][of ][cPC ][praying ][that ][in ][the ][circumstances stated ][in]the affidavit filed therewith, [the ][Hon'ble Court ][may be pleased ][to ][permit ][the ][Appellant]company to withdraw [the ][present appeal ][for ][Asst. Year ][2003-04 bearing ] [No.]368 of 2010 under the [VSV Scheme ][in ][the interest of ][Justice ][and be ][pleased ][to ][pass]such further or other order [or orders ][as ][the ][Hon'ble ][Court ][may deem ][fit ][and proper ][in]the facts and circumstances [of ][the ][case.] ITTA NO.368 0F 2010: lncome Tax Tribunal [Appeal ][under ][section ][260-4 ][of ][the ][lncome Tax ][Act, ][1961,]against the order dated 25lo7l2oo8 [in ] [No.735 ][to ][737lHydl2007 on ][the file ][of the]lncome Tax Appellate Tribunal, [Hyderabad Bench ]['A' ][Hyderabad, ][for the ][assessment]year 2OO1-02 to 2003-04 [preferred ]against [the ][order ][dated ][91412007 ][in Appeal ]-lll [No.]ffA287 to 2g1tDc2(1) clT [(A) ][lll ][06-07 on the ][file ][of ][the commissioner ][of ][lncome Tax]circle 2(1) (Appeals V), Hyderabad [preferred against the order dated ][20/1212006 in GIR]AAACJ'2|7JlJ-041 on the file of the lncome [Tax ][Officer, ][Ward ][circle-2(1) ][Hyderabad.] For the Appellant : SRI Y.RATNAKAR, [Advocate] For the Respondent : NO The Court made the following: ORDER I // ON AND THE HON[,BLE]Szu JUSTICE T. TH GOUD I.A. No. 1of 202L AND I.T.T.A.No.368 of 2070 COMMO N JUDGMENT: lPer the Hon'ble the ChrerrJuslice Sarrsh Chendra Shomul I.A.No.1 of 2O2l has been liled lor withdrawal of the presenrappeal, as the appellant has approached the respondent under theDirect Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme, 202O.Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme, 202O. I.A. is allowed. The appeal is dismissed as withdrawn withliberty to lile a fresh appeal in case the cause arises in future. Pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall aiso stancldismissed. There shall be no order as to costs. Sdi.M,SANTHI VARDHANIJOINT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPYII 4L SECTION OFFICER To2. 1. The Commissioner of Income The Chairman, lncome Tax Appellate Tribunal, Bench Tax, nppeafs-ilf ,'IiO"rrorO.,A, Hyderabad.3. The tncome Tax Officer, Circle _2.'n[Jei"U'ri.' ['''"] 1. 9n" [to Sri y.Ratnakar, ][nOvoc'atdtOCUCi]5. Two CD Copies6 One Spare Copynl.k..B I HIGH COURT OATED:2111012021 COMMON JUDGMENT l.A.No.1 ot 2021ANDITTA.No.368 of 2010 DISMISSING THE APPEAL AS WITHDRAWN, /.\ r.r)s)lvI"o -,,.rc [STAr4']),(:l3 0 [ii[c?0?1]i:,L)*,.