Itta/369/2014 Of The Commissione Of Income Tax (Central) v. Kishoresons Detergents Pvt Ltd
High Court
20 Jun 2014 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · taphc
Parties
Itta/369/2014 Of The Commissione Of Income Tax (Central) v. Kishoresons Detergents Pvt Ltd
Date of order
20 Jun 2014
Assessment year(s)
2006-07
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Itta/369/2014 Of The Commissione Of Income Tax (Central) v. Kishoresons Detergents Pvt Ltd, the High Court (2014) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: The appeal is accordingly dismissed.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT HYDERABADFOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AND THE STATE OF ANDHRAPRADESH
THE HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SRI KALYAN JYOTI SENGUPTAANDTHE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR
I.T.T.A. No. 369 of 2014
Date: 20.06.2014
Between:
The Commissioner of Income Tax (Central),Hyderabad.
… Appellant
And
M/s. Kishoresons Detergents Pvt., Ltd.,Hyderabad.
… Respondent
This Court made the following:
THE HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SRI KALYAN JYOTI SENGUPTAANDTHE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE SANJAY KUMARI.T.T.A. No. 369 of 2014
JUDGMENT:(Per the Hon’ble The Chief Justice Sri Kalyan Jyoti Sengupta)
This appeal is sought to be preferred and admitted against the
impugned judgment and order of the learned Tribunal in relation to the
assessment year 2006-07 on the following suggested question of law.
“Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case,the Tribunal is correct in law in holding that the Assessing Officer isrequired to confine himself only to the material found during thecourse of search for the purpose of computing the income u/s.153A/153C?”
It appears that the Assessing Officer without rejecting the booksof accounts had estimated the income. The Commissioner of IncomeTax (Appeals) found that without rejecting the books of accounts,estimation of income is not permissible and such an exercise, accordingto him, is not sustainable. In fact, the learned Tribunal found that therewas no incriminating evidence to prove that unaccounted incomes weregenerated by suppression of profit.
In view of the above findings of the authorities, we do not seeany reason to interfere with the judgment and order of the learnedTribunal.
The appeal is accordingly dismissed.
Miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in this writ petition shallstand dismissed. No order as to costs.
Date: 20.06.2014ES
___________________
K.J. SENGUPTA, CJ
___________________SANJAY KUMAR, J
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.