Itta/370/2013 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax-I v. M/S.a.p.industrial Infrastructure Corporation Ltd
High Court
27 Aug 2013 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · taphc
Parties
Itta/370/2013 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax-I v. M/S.a.p.industrial Infrastructure Corporation Ltd
Date of order
27 Aug 2013
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Itta/370/2013 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax-I v. M/S.a.p.industrial Infrastructure Corporation Ltd, the High Court (2013) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: Hence, this appeal is dismissed.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SRI KALYAN JYOTI SENGUPTAAND
HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE K.C. BHANU
I.T.T.A.No.370 of 2013
Date: 27-08-2013
Between:
The Commissioner of Income Tax-IHyderabad.
… Appellant
And
1.M/s. A.P. Industrial Infrastructure Corpn. Ltd.Parishram Bhavan, Basheerbagh, Hyderabad.
… Respondent
HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SRI KALYAN JYOTI SENGUPTAAND
HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE K.C. BHANU
I.T.T.A.No.370 of 2013
JUDGMENT:(Per Hon’ble the Chief Justice Sri Kalyan Jyoti Sengupta)
We have heard Mr. J.V. Prasad, learned Standing Counsel forIncome Tax, and have gone through the impugned judgment and orderof the learned Tribunal.
It appears that the Tribunal, while passing the impugnedjudgment and order, has relied on the identical issue in an earlierdecision. There is no statement in this appeal papers that any appealhas been preferred against the earlier judgment and order of theTribunal.
Hence, this appeal is dismissed. No order as to costs.Miscellaneous Petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed.
_________________
K.J. SENGUPTA, CJ
Date: 27-08-2013YCR
_________________
K.C. BHANU, J
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue