Itta/372/2018 Of The Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax v. A.p. State Warehousing Corporation
High Court
19 Nov 2024 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · aphc
Parties
Itta/372/2018 Of The Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax v. A.p. State Warehousing Corporation
Date of order
19 Nov 2024
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Itta/372/2018 Of The Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax v. A.p. State Warehousing Corporation, the High Court (2024) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Sections referenced in this judgment
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: AMARAVATI
TUESDAY, THE NINETEENTH DAY OF NOVEMBERTWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE G.NARENDAR
AND
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T.C.D.SEKHAR
INCOME TAX TRIBUNAL APPEAL No: 372 OF 2018
Between:
The Principal Commissioner of Income Tax, Vijayawada
...APPELLANT
AND
A.P. State Warehousing Corporation, D.No.11-9411, K.[Shankar][ Rao][ Street]Beside Jointcare Time Hospital and More Super Market, Ashok Nagar,Kanuru, Vijayawada.
...RESPONDENT
Appeal under section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961,[against]orderoftheIncomeTaxAppellateTribunal,HyderabadBench‘B’, Hyderabadin I.T.A.No.1006/Hyd/2017, for Assessment[Year][ 2012-13,]dated 3110.2017.
Counsel for the Appellant: SRI. J.V. PRASAD (SC FOR INCOME[TAX)]Counsel for the Respondent: NONE APPEAREDThe Court delivered the following Judgment:
s
APHC010389172018IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRAPRADESHAT AMARAVATI(Special Original Jurisdiction)
[3507]
%’TUESDAY,THE NINETEENTH DAY OF NOVEMBERTWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE G.NARENDARTHE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T.C.D.SEKHARINCOME TAX TRIBUNAL APPEAL NO: 372/2018
Between:
The Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax
...APPELLANT
AND
A P State Warehousing Corporation
...RESPONDENT
Counsel for the Appellant:
1.J V PRASAD (SC FOR INCOME TAX)
Counsel for the Respondent:
1.
The Court made the following: (per Hon’ble Sri Justice G.Narendar)
The learned counsel for the appellant-Department has[filed]a memo into Court, including a copy of the circular whereby, theappellant-Department has formulated a litigation policy[and][ under]the said policy,it has been resolved not to initiate any appealsorpetitions, where the monetary stakes involvedarelessthanRs.2 Crores and hence, he prays leave of the Court to withdrawthe appeal.
2.Submission is placed on record.
3.Accordingly,the appealis dismissed as withdrawn.No
costs.
As a sequel thereto, the miscellaneous petitions, if any,pending in this appeal shall stand closed.
SD/- P VENKATA RAMANA
JOINT REGISTRAR
//TRUE COPY//
SECTIo(iol=fTCER
To
1. The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Hyderabad Bench[‘B’,][ Hyderabad.]
2. One CC to Sri J V Prasad, SC for Income Tax,
3. Three CD Copies
GLM
vna
HIGH COURT
DATED:19/11/2024
JUDGMENT:
ITTA.No.372of 2018
DISMISSING THE ITTAAS WITHDRAWN
V-'oT•A.,rfUi0 5 MAR 2025&r^SPATCH^.#^
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.