In Itta/375/2013 Of Paro Food Products v. Commissioner Of Income Tax -Vi, the High Court (2013) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Decision: Hence, the appeal is dismissed.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SRI KALYAN JYOTI SENGUPTAANDHON’BLE SRI JUSTICE K.C.BHANU
I.T.T.A.No.375 of 2013
Date: 28.08.2013
Between:
Paro Food Products, Hyderabad,represented by its partner Umakant Agarwal.
.....Appellant
AND
Commissioner of Income Tax-VI,Hyderabad.
...Respondent
HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SRI KALYAN JYOTI SENGUPTAANDHON’BLE SRI JUSTICE K.C.BHANU
I.T.T.A.No.375 of 2013
JUDGMENT:(per Hon’ble the Chief Justice Sri Kalyan Jyoti Sengupta )
The grievance of the appellant is that some of the groundshave not been dealt with by the learned Tribunal. If they are notdealt with by the Tribunal, the remedy is not before us. It is beforethat Tribunal alone. The appellant may approach the Tribunal withappropriate application.
Hence, the appeal is dismissed. No order as to costs.
___________________
K.J.
SENGUPTA, CJ
_______________
28.08.2013 Gsn
K.C.BHANU, J
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue