Case LawHigh Court › Itta/376/2014 Of Hyderabad Bottling Co L...

Itta/376/2014 Of Hyderabad Bottling Co Ltd v. Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax

High Court 08 Mar 2021 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · taphc
Parties
Itta/376/2014 Of Hyderabad Bottling Co Ltd v. Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax
Date of order
08 Mar 2021
Assessment year(s)
2004-06
Outcome
Other

Case summary

In Itta/376/2014 Of Hyderabad Bottling Co Ltd v. Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax, the High Court (2021) decided the matter.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IVONDAY ,THE EIGHTH DAY OF N4ARCHTWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY ONETWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY ONE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE M.S.RAMACHANDRA RAO ..\N [) THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T.VINOD KUMAR l.T.T.A. NO: 376 OF 2014 lncome Tax Tribunal Appeal Under Section 260 of the lncome Tax Act, againstthe order of the lncome Tax Appellate Tribunal, Hyderabad Bench ['B' ]Hyderabad inlTA.No.1036 Hyd 2010 for Assessment Year 2004-06, dated 31.12.2008, [preferred]against the Order of the Commissioner of lncome Tax Appeals Hyderabad, Appeal No.0317/08-09, dated, preferred against the Order of the Dy. Commr. Of lncome -TaxCircle-2(2) PAN/GlR No. AAACA 26801 DATED 31 .12.2008. Between: M/s. Hyderabad Bottling Co Ltd, Plot No.40, IDA [Balanagar, Hyderabad-500037.]Hyderabad Rep by its Managing Director. ...APPELLANT AND Deputy Commissioner of lncome [Tax, ]Ctrcle-2(2), [Hyderabad-500001.] ...RESPONDENT Counsel for the Appellant:SRl. [P. ] Counsel for the Respondent: [M/S. K MAMATA]The Court made the following: To, PN/ llo \o l-i ll.A ll LF., sRl,, t, sT I c |: ]1.S. R,\NlAc FL.\ N I) IIA llAo .\\ l) ilo\oLllt,\tlI_t.t Stit.tt'sil( t. L\ I\ot) Kt \t{tt l.l.'l'..\. \o..j'6 OIr 20ll ,lL DCltEN'I: //).r.\/,./r,,/r.. r/.\ r,l , t t t t,t c' I t t n ilr t llt o t Learned counsel for the appellant has flled letter dated 03.03.2021seeking permission to witltdraw the appeal ri,ith libt'rty to file declarationseeking permission to witltdraw the appeal ri,ith libt'rty to file declarationunder the Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Act, 2020 for full ancl finalsettlement ofall the dues pending for the Assessrnent year 2005-2006. 2, Recording the same, the ll''l'r\ is disrnissed as withdrawn withlibelty to revive the ITTA if there is rro settlement Llnder the said Act 3. Pending miscellaneous petitions, if an1', shall also standdismissecl. No costs. Sd/. K. SRINIVASA RAOJOINT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY' SECTION OFFICER 1. The lncomeTax Appellate Tribunal, Hyderabad [Bench ]- [B, Hyderabad.] 2. One CC to Sri. P. Vikram, Advocate 3. One CC to M/s. K. lV]amata, Advocate IOPUC] 4. Two CD Copies. \ HIGH COURT MSR,J&TVK,JirDATED:08/03/2021 ORDER ITTA.No.376 of 2014 Disd as withdrawThe ITTA 1'dCT;I 16:(6l\1025 !,l|ff 2021rl).a'**T.&.g*f q^lDV
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan