Itta/378/2012 Of Commissioner Of Income Tax-Ii v. M/S.transport Corporation Of India Limited
High Court
10 Apr 2025 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · taphc
Parties
Itta/378/2012 Of Commissioner Of Income Tax-Ii v. M/S.transport Corporation Of India Limited
Date of order
10 Apr 2025
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Itta/378/2012 Of Commissioner Of Income Tax-Ii v. M/S.transport Corporation Of India Limited, the High Court (2025) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: Therefore, the appeal filed by the Department is dismissed interms of the aforesaid Circular No.9 of 2024 dated 17.09.2024.However, if the appeal comes within the exception of CircularNo.5 of 2024, it would be open to the Income Tax Department toseek revival of the appeal.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
THURSDAY ,THE TENTH DAY OF APRILTWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE P.SAM KOSHY
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NARSING RAO NANDIKONDA
INCOME TAX TRIBUNAL APPEAL NO: 378 OF 2012
Income Tax Tribunal Appeal filed under Section 260 A of the lncome Tax Act,1961, aggrieved by the Order dated 16.11.201'1 , of the lncome Tax AppellateTribunal, passed in ITA No.11O3lHydl2O04, for the Assessment Year 2011- ['12,]on the file of the lncome Tax Appellate Tribunal, Hyderabad 'A' Bench,Hyderabad.
Between:
Commissioner of lncome Tax-ll, Hyderabad
,..APPELLANT
AND
M/s. Transport Corporation of lndia Limited,306 and 307, lll Floor,Ashok Bhoopal Chambers, S.P. Road, Secunderabad.
...RESPONDENT
Counsel for the Appellant: MS.K.MAMATASENIOR STANDING COUNSEL FOR INCOMETAX DEPARTMENT
Counsel for the Respondent : SRI Y. RATNAKAR
The Court made the following : JUDGMENT
1
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE P.SAM KOSHYANDTHE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NARSING RAONANDIKONDA
ITTA No.378 oF 2012
JUDGMENT: (per Hon'ble Sri ,Iustice p.Sam Koshy)
Heard Ms.K.Mamata, leamed Senior Standing Counsel forthe Income Tax Department for the appellant. perused the record.
2This appeal under Section 2604 ol the lncome 1.ax Act,1961, has been preferred by the Revenue as lhe appellantagainst the order dated 16. ll.20lt passed by the lncome Taxagainst the order dated 16. ll.20lt passed by the lncome TaxAppellate Tribunal, Hyderabad Bench ,A,, Hlrderabad,lnI.T.A.No.1lO3/Hyd/2004 lor rhe Assessmenr year 2001_02.3. Central Board of Direct Taxes (CBDT) has issued CircularNo.9 of 2024 dated 17.09.2024, amending the previous CircularNo.5 of 2024 dated 15.03.2024, by further enhancing rhe mone[arylimits for filing appears by the lncome Tax Department before the3. Central Board of Direct Taxes (CBDT) has issued CircularNo.9 of 2024 dated 17.09.2024, amending the previous CircularNo.5 of 2024 dated 15.03.2024, by further enhancing rhe mone[arylimits for filing appears by the lncome Tax Department before theIncome Tax Appeltate Tribunals, High Courts and Supreme Courtas a measure for reducing litigation. In paragraph 2 of the saidas a measure for reducing litigation. In paragraph 2 of the said
Circular, we find that the monetary limit fixed for filing an appeal
before the High Court is Rs.2.00 crore.
4ln the instant appeal, tax effect is well below the monetarylimit.limit.
5. Therefore, the appeal filed by the Department is dismissed interms of the aforesaid Circular No.9 of 2024 dated 17.09.2024.However, if the appeal comes within the exception of CircularNo.5 of 2024, it would be open to the Income Tax Department toseek revival of the appeal. There shall be no order as to costs.
6. Consequently, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shallstand closed.
SD/. M.RAMANA KRISHNAJOINT REGISTRARt.,lSEC{NON OFFICER/
//TRUE COPY//
To,
'1 . The lncome Tax Appellate Tribunal, Hyderabad 'A' Bench,Hyderabad.
2. One CC to SRI K.MAMATA, SENIOR STANDING TAXDEPARTMENT
3. One CC to SRl. Y RATNAKAR, Advocate IOPUCI
4. Two CD Copies
PCSDtk
HIGH COURT
PSK,J&NNR,J
DATED:10 10412025
,.:[r-'- '- ][- ][--':_ ][']\,/.,1,/, [-]1$1-t)03 sEP116<,*-aDE.;;' '. rct-'' EO
JUDGMENT
lTTA.No.378 of 2012
DISMISSING THE INCOME TAX TRIBUNAL APPEAL
G.o$du-diia2
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.