Case LawHigh Court › Itta/379/2013 Of Commmissioner Of Income...

Itta/379/2013 Of Commmissioner Of Income Tax-Iii, Hyd v. M/S Ravi Cranes And Movers Limited, Hyd

High Court 20 Dec 2024 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · taphc
Parties
Itta/379/2013 Of Commmissioner Of Income Tax-Iii, Hyd v. M/S Ravi Cranes And Movers Limited, Hyd
Date of order
20 Dec 2024
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

Case summary

In Itta/379/2013 Of Commmissioner Of Income Tax-Iii, Hyd v. M/S Ravi Cranes And Movers Limited, Hyd, the High Court (2024) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Decision: Accordingly' the [appeal ][is ][dismissed ][as ][withdrawn ][in ][terms]of the liberty as PraYed [for.] Miscellaneous applications [pending, ][if ][any, ][shall ][stand ][closed'] However, there shall [b][e ][no ][order ][as ][to ][costs.] 6A[--A.v.s.s.c.s.M.SARMA tJolNr lEGlsrRAR //,TRUE \-SECTT6il...

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

[ [34181] IN THE HIGH COURT FORo" oF rE LA N G A NA "o'J*toEHE FRIDNY, THE TWENTIETH DAY OF DECEMBERTWo rHousAND AND TWENTy FouR--.. PRESENT THE HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE ALOK ARADHETHE HoNouRABLE sRr.tlu.or,". J sREENrvAs RAo tNCO ME TAX TRIBUNA L APPEAL NO: 379 OF 2013 lncome Tax Tribunal Appeal Under Section 260 A of the lncome Tax Actthe order dated order dated dated A of the lncome Tax Actof the lncome Tax Actlncome Tax Act1961 against the order dated order dated dated Tribunal, Hyderabad Benches 21-og-2otz - on ttre rie of the rncome Tax ApperateA, HvourJr,"',In Assessment year 2007_08 preferred ,.r.O.*o .701tHyd12012 for2011-12 file of commissioner prefe'ed against of rncorne the order Tax "g"ir.tl;Oroer - ,r, a^*i Hyderabacr zi-ii-2009 in dated Appear 27_02_2012 No.263/crr-rr/on thepassed in pAN.No.ffi1r}t"Tt- on the file of the Deputv c"r.i*Lr", of rncome-Tax, circre-3(1), Between: Commmissioner of lncome Tax_lll, HyD., l.T.Towers, A.C.Guards Hyderabad....AppellanURespondent AND M/S Ravi Cranes and Movers Limited,6_16/5, KUkatpally, Hyderabad. ...RespondenUAppellant counsel for the Appellant : sri J v prasad, sc for tncome Tax DepartmentCounsel for the Respondent : None AppearedThe Court delivered the following: Judgment r I THE I{ON'BI,E THE [ JUSTICE][ AIl)K][ ARADHE] AND THE HON'BLE [SRI JUSTICE J.SRE] [ RAO] INCOME TAX[TRIBT'NAL][ APPEAL No.][379 of ][2O13] JTIDGMENT: [(Per ][tlrc ][Hon'ble ][tle ][ChieJ ][Jltsttce ][Alok ][Aradhe)] Mr. J.V.Prasad, [Iearned ][Senior Standing Counsel ][for ][Income ][Tax]Department [for ][llre ][aPPellant.] 2. karned Senior [Standing ][Counsel ][for ][the ][appellant ][seeks]leave of this [Cor:rt to ][withdraw the ][appeal ][in ][the light ][of ][the ][Circular]No.O9 /2024, [dated ][17.O9.2024' ][with ][the liberty ][to ][revive ][the ][same ][in]case the subject [matter ][of ][the ][appeal ][falls ][in ][any ][of ][the ][exceptions]provided in the Circular [No.S/2024 ][dated ][15'03'2O24'] 3. Accordingly' the [appeal ][is ][dismissed ][as ][withdrawn ][in ][terms]of the liberty as PraYed [for.] Miscellaneous applications [pending, ][if ][any, ][shall ][stand ][closed'] However, there shall [b][e ][no ][order ][as ][to ][costs.] 6A[--A.v.s.s.c.s.M.SARMA tJolNr lEGlsrRAR //,TRUE \-SECTT6il To, . The lncome [Tax Appellate ][Tribunal' ][Hyderabad Benches ][- ][A' ][Hyderabad] . ih;;;;i.sionei [of lncome Tax - ][lll' ][Hvderabad ][..] 1 2 [[..]]. The Deputy [Commissionei ][oi ][tn"ome-rai' ][circle-3(1)' ][Hyderabad'] 3 . One CC [to Sri ] [Prasad, ] [for lncome Tax ][Department ] 4 Two CD CoPies 5 ADI(ghw HIGH COURT DATED:2011212024 JUDGMENT lTTA.No.379 of 2013 :'..jj-, r'rt ST;[t-->-\..']" [c ]ci.\(o0 B [,lA}l ][z$fr]4,i,.'i ut* ,//Dt:)^rn,11;rt('l oV--.? DISMISSING THE APPEAL AS WITHDRAWNWITHOUT COSTS a[(!P?e\]Yv- fft\a5
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan