Case Law › High Court › Itta v. Commissioner Of Income Tax Hyd

Itta v. Commissioner Of Income Tax Hyd

High Court 24 Jul 2014 In favour of: Revenue

Forum / Bench

High Court · taphc

Parties

Date of order

24 Jul 2014

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Dismissed

Case summary

In Itta v. Commissioner Of Income Tax Hyd, the High Court (2014) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Decision: Hence, the appeal is dismissed for default.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDYAND THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE CHALLA KODANDA RAM ORDER: I.T.T.A.No.38 of 2002 The appeal was listed ‘for hearing’, on 23.07.2014. Since therewas no representation for the appellant on that day, it was directed tobe listed today ‘for Dismissal’. Even today also, there is norepresentation for the appellant. Hence, the appeal is dismissed for default. There shall be noorder as to costs. The miscellaneous petitions filed in this appeal shall also standdisposed of. ____________________ L.NARASIMHA REDDY, J. _____________________ CHALLA KODANDA RAM, J. Dated:24.07.2014 GJ THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY Civil Revision Petition No.1100 of 2011 Date:18.07.2014 GJ

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.