Itta/38/2009 Of Avanti Feeds Ltd v. Dy.commissioner Of Income Tax
High Court
07 Jan 2025 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · taphc
Parties
Itta/38/2009 Of Avanti Feeds Ltd v. Dy.commissioner Of Income Tax
Date of order
07 Jan 2025
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Itta/38/2009 Of Avanti Feeds Ltd v. Dy.commissioner Of Income Tax, the High Court (2025) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Decision: Th,: appeal is dismissed for want of prosecution.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANAAT HYDERABAD
IUESDAY, THE SEVENTH DAY OF JANUARYTWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE
PRESENT
THE HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE ALOK ARADHEAND
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE J. SREENIVAS RAO
lNcoME TAX TRIBUNAL APPEAL No: 38 of 2009
Appeal filed under Section 260-4 of the lncome Tax [Act, ][1961 ][against ][the]Order dated 23-01-2009 [passed ]in |.T.A.No.1170/Hydl04 [for ][Assessment ][year]2OO1-02 on the file of the lncome Tax Appellate Tribunal, [Bench-'B', ][Hyderabad]preferred against the Order dated 10-09-2004 passed in ITA No.0065/ClT(Ay04-05 on the file of the Commissioner of lncome [Tax ][(Appeals) ]-ll, [Hyderabad]preferred against the Assessment Order dated 26-03-2004 [passed ][in]P.A.N./G.l.R. No.AABCA7365E on the file of the lncome [Tax ][Department.]Between:
Avanti Feeds Ltd.,6-3-658, Somajiguda, Hyderabad [- ]500 082
...APPELLANT
AND
Dy. Commissioner of lncome Tax, Circle-1(1), [Aayakar Bhavan, ][Basheerbagh,]Hyderabad.
...RESPONDENT\
Counsel for the Appellant: Sri M.V. Ramachandra [Rao(No ][Representation)]
Counsel for the Respondent: Mr. J.V. Prasad,(Sr. Standing Counsel for lncome Tax)
The Court delivered the following: JUDGMENT
THE HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE
AND
THE HON'BLE SRI WSTICE [J.SREENTVAS RAO]
INCOME TAX TRIBUNAL APPEAL [No.38 ][of ][2OO9]
JUDGMENT:[(Per ][the ][Hon'ble ][ttrc Chief Justice AIok ][Aradhe)]
None for the appellant
Mr. J.V.Prasad, learned Senior [Standing Counsel ][for ][Income]
Tax Department [for the ][respondent.]
2. None had appeared on behalf of the appeJlant even on
20.r2.2024
3. It appears the appellant is not interested inprosecuting the aPPeal.
4. Th,: appeal is dismissed for want of prosecution.
Miscella:reous applications, if any pending, shall stand
closed. There [r;hal1 ]be no order as to costs.
edl-a.v.s.s.c.s.M. JOINT REGISTRARll, V l\L---SECTION OFFICER
//TRUE
To,
1. The lncome [1-ax ][Appellate ][Tribunal' Bench-'B" ][Hyderabad']
2. The [Commissioner of lncome Tax (Appeals) ][-ll' ][Hyderabad']
3. The Deputy [Commissioner of lncome Tax' Circle 1(1)' Hyderabad]
4. One CC to [Sri ][M.V ][Ramachandra ][Rao, ][Advocate ][ ]
'v
5. One CC to Mr. J.V. Prasad (Sr- Standing Counsel for lncome Tax)
6. Two CD Copies
kam/ghw
/
HIGH COURT
DATED:07 tO1t2O2S\\JUDGMENTITTA.No.38 of 2009
THE APPEAL ISDISMISSED FORWANT OF PROSECUTION
.o€@€w,il(e5
3[(liF- ][s ][r4][ 14-](or10 |t_DI l-r2025zaa/*:-sF4ic\rf--o
\1
j
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.