Itta/38/2020 Of Smt. G. Madhuri Kiran v. The Income Tax Officer

IN THE HIGH COURT f ^, [8\lJf,lBlf ] [oF ] THURSDAY, THE E Erw o iuo'utsi ff S p,0ir"i,#^ [- ]li,.JL[ ", THE HoNoURABLE SRI JPRESENTTHE H O NO U R^''-. $T['#" Tffi.Jffi:: -^" LT.T. A. NO: 38 0F 2020 lncome Tax Tribunar Appear under section 260-4 of the rncome Tax Act, .196.1,against the order of the rncome Tax Appe ate Tribunar, Hyderabad Bench B,Hyderabad in rrA No.5l8iHydr2ol2forAssessmentyear2oo4-2oo5dated 2gro4r2o14against the order of the rncome Tax Appe ate Tribunar, Hyderabad Bench B,Hyderabad in rrA No.5l8iHydr2ol2forAssessmentyear2oo4-2oo5dated 2gro4r2o14 Between: Smt. G.lVadhuri Kiran AND ...APPELLANT The lncome Tax Officer, Ward- 6(3), Hyderabad ...RESPONDENT For the Appellant : SRt K.VASANTH KUMAR, Advocate For the Respondent : SRI K.RAJI REDDy SC FOR INCOME TAX DEPARTMENT The Court made the followino: JUDGIVENT HONOURAI]LE [SIlI ] [NI'S'RAN'I ] ANI) I'l O NOU [l-r ] [[''I' ] [t ] [N'l ] [ll] I.T.T.A. N[o.38 ] [2020] .IU[.DGN{ENT:][ (Per ][Sri ][Justice M ][S. ][Ramdchdndra ][Rto)] A memo has been [filed ][by the ][counsel ][fol ][the ][appellant ][stating]that the appellant [wishes ][to ][withdraw ][this ][appeal ][in ][view ][of ][an ][order]dated 10.03.2021 in Form-3 [passed ][by the ][Designated ][Authority ][under]the Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas [Act,2020.] 2. In that view of the matter, this appeal is [dismissed ][as ][rvithdrawn]Iw,ith Iibeny to approach this Court if there is no settlement [under ][the said]Ac1. No costs. 3. Pending miscellaneous petitious. il an1'. shali also standclisnrisseci. Sd/-B.S.CHIRANJEEVIJOINT REGISTRAR,TRUE COPY//GoSECTION OFFICER To 1. The lncome Tax Appellate Tribunal, Hyderabad B-Bench, Hyderabad. 2. One CC to Sri K.Vasanth Kumar, Advocate (OPUC) 3. One CC to Sri K.Raji Reddy, SC for lncome Tax Department (OPUC) 4. Two CD Copies Kj.+),v HIGH DATED:1 [810312021] JUDGMENTITTA.No.38 of [2020] ITTA DISMISSED AS NO COSTS. Axx.; 1HeST4 14-qJoo0IAPt{ Y:lfllo-L'irn(:i')