In Itta/382/2014 Of Commissioner Of Income Tax-Iii v. Sri Rao Subba Rao [Huf], the High Court (2014) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: Therefore, this appeal is also dismissed.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT HYDERABADFOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AND THE STATE OF ANDHRAPRADESH
PRESENT
THE HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SRI KALYAN JYOTISENGUPTA AND
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR
I.T.T.A. NO.382 OF 2014
DATED:19.06.2014
Between:
Commissioner of Income Tax-III,IT Towers, AC Guards,Masab Tank, Hyderabad. … Appellant
And
Sri Rao Subba Rao … Respondent
THE HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SRI KALYAN JYOTISENGUPTA AND
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR
I.T.T.A. NO.382 OF 2014
JUDGMENT:(per the Hon’ble the Chief Justice Sri Kalyan Jyoti Sengupta)
On an identical issue an appeal was dismissed.
Therefore, this appeal is also dismissed. There will be no orderas to costs.
________________________
K.J. SENGUPTA, CJ
_______________________
SANJAY KUMAR, J
19.6.2014
bnr/cbs
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue