Case LawHigh Court › Itta/383/2014 Of Brij Gopal P.shah (Huf)...

Itta/383/2014 Of Brij Gopal P.shah (Huf) v. The Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax

High Court 01 Jul 2014 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · taphc
Parties
Itta/383/2014 Of Brij Gopal P.shah (Huf) v. The Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax
Date of order
01 Jul 2014
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Itta/383/2014 Of Brij Gopal P.shah (Huf) v. The Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax, the High Court (2014) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Decision: Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed as being withdrawn.However, liberty is given to the appellant to file a fresh appeal.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT HYDERABADFOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AND THE STATE OF ANDHRAPRADESH PRESENT THE HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SRI KALYAN JYOTISENGUPTA AND THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR I.T.T.A. NO.383 of 2014 DATED:01.07.2014 Between: Brij Gopal P. Shah … Appellant And The Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax,Hyderabad … Respondent THE HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SRI KALYAN JYOTISENGUPTA AND THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR I.T.T.A. No.383 OF 2014 JUDGMENT:(per the Hon’ble the Chief Justice Sri Kalyan Jyoti Sengupta) Learned counsel for the appellant wants to withdraw the appeal,because of a formal defect therein. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed as being withdrawn.However, liberty is given to the appellant to file a fresh appeal. Noorder as to costs. Consequently, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in theappeal shall also stand dismissed. ________________________ K.J. SENGUPTA, CJ _______________________ SANJAY KUMAR, J 01.07.2014cbs/bnr
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan