Case LawHigh Court › Itta/386/2013 Of The Commissioner Of Inc...

Itta/386/2013 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax Iv v. M/S Matrix Power Pvt Ltd

High Court 03 Sep 2013 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · taphc
Parties
Itta/386/2013 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax Iv v. M/S Matrix Power Pvt Ltd
Date of order
03 Sep 2013
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

Case summary

In Itta/386/2013 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax Iv v. M/S Matrix Power Pvt Ltd, the High Court (2013) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Decision: Under the circumstances, the appeal is dismissed. ___________________ K.J.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

Sections referenced in this judgment

The order — as passed by the High Court

THE HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SRI KALYAN JYOTI SENGUPTA AND THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE K.C. BHANU I.T.T.A. No.386 OF 2013 DATED:3.9.2013 Between: The Commissioner of Income Tax-IV,Hyderabad. … Appellant And M/s. Matrix Power Pvt. Ltd.,Hyderabad. ….Respondent THE HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SRI KALYAN JYOTI SENGUPTA ANDTHE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE K.C. BHANU I.T.T.A. No.386 OF 2013 Judgment:(per the Hon’ble the Chief Justice Sri Kalyan Jyoti Sengupta) We have heard Mr. J.V. Prasad, learned counsel for the appellantand have gone through the impugned judgment and order of the learnedTribunal. The present appeal is sought to be admitted on the followingsuggested questions of law: 1)Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case and in law,the order of the Tribunal suffers from perversity in considering irrelevantmaterial ignoring those relevant in arriving at its conclusions ?the order of the Tribunal suffers from perversity in considering irrelevantmaterial ignoring those relevant in arriving at its conclusions ? 2)Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case and in law,the Tribunal is correct in holding that the reassessment proceedings ofthe assessing officer are null and void ?the Tribunal is correct in holding that the reassessment proceedings ofthe assessing officer are null and void ? It appears, the learned Tribunal has found that the AssessingOfficer while reopening the assessment under Section 148 of theAct has relied on one of the two possible views. It is settledprinciple of law that on that ground, no reopening of assessment ispermitted. The Tribunal has come to a correct finding. Under the circumstances, the appeal is dismissed. ___________________ K.J. SENGUPTA, CJ ____________ K.C. BHANU, J 3.9.2013PNB
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ Defend a reassessment (Sec 148) notice → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan