Case LawHigh Court › Itta/387/2013 Of The Commissioner Of Inc...

Itta/387/2013 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax -Vi v. Madrasi Chakkar Beedi Factory Pvt Ltd

High Court 03 Sep 2013 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · taphc
Parties
Itta/387/2013 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax -Vi v. Madrasi Chakkar Beedi Factory Pvt Ltd
Date of order
03 Sep 2013
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Itta/387/2013 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax -Vi v. Madrasi Chakkar Beedi Factory Pvt Ltd, the High Court (2013) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Decision: The appeal is thus dismissed. ___________________ K.J.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

Sections referenced in this judgment

THE HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SRI KALYAN JYOTI SENGUPTA AND THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE K.C. BHANU I.T.T.A. No.387 OF 2013 DATED:3.9.2013 Between: The Commissioner of Income Tax-VI,Hyderabad. … Appellant AndM/s. Madarasi Chakkar Beedi Factory Pvt. Ltd.,Warangal. ….Respondent THE HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SRI KALYAN JYOTI SENGUPTA ANDTHE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE K.C. BHANU I.T.T.A. No.387 OF 2013 Judgment:(per the Hon’ble the Chief Justice Sri Kalyan Jyoti Sengupta) We have heard the learned counsel for the appellant and havegone through the impugned judgment and order of the learned Tribunal. The order under Section 263 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 itselfhas been set aside by the Tribunal by its order dated 16.7.2010 in I.T.A.No. 734/Hyd/2009. Hence, the basis has gone and the consequentialaction has to be negatived. Accordingly, the learned Tribunal has takencorrect steps. The appeal is thus dismissed. ___________________ K.J. SENGUPTA, CJ ____________ K.C. BHANU, J 3.9.2013 PNB
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan