Itta/388/2018 Of Pr.commissioner Of Income Tax-2 v. M/S.gayatri Agro Industrial Power Ltd
High Court
02 Aug 2023 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · taphc
Parties
Itta/388/2018 Of Pr.commissioner Of Income Tax-2 v. M/S.gayatri Agro Industrial Power Ltd
Date of order
02 Aug 2023
Assessment year(s)
2003-2004
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Itta/388/2018 Of Pr.commissioner Of Income Tax-2 v. M/S.gayatri Agro Industrial Power Ltd, the High Court (2023) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE
WEDNESDAY,THE SECOND DAY OF AUGUSTTWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY THREE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE P.SAM KOSHYANDTHE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE LAXMI NARAYANA ALISHETTY
INCOME TAX TRIBUNAL APPEAL NO: 388 OF 2018
(lncome Tax Tribunal Appeal Under Section 260-A of the lncome Tax Act, againstthe order of the lncome Tax Appellate Tribunal, Hyderabad [Bench ' ][A', ][Hyderabad ][in]ITA No.105/HYD12015, lor assessment Year 2003-2004, dated [15.11.2017,]preferred against the Order of the Commissioner of lncome Tax Appeals-V,Hyderabad, Appeal No.022312014-15lDClT, Cir. 9(1/ClT(A)-YlHydl2014-15, [dated]18-11-2014, preferred against the Order of the Deputy Commissioner [of ][lncome Tax]Central Circle 9('l ), Hyderabad.Between:
Pr. Commissioner Of lncome Tax-2, Hyderabad
...APPELLANT
AND
M/s.Gayatri Agro lndustrial Power Ltd., [8-2-34811,Flat ][No. ][102,Flora ][Apartments,]Road No.3,Banjara Hills, Hyderabad 500034
...RESPONDENT
Counsel for the Appellant :Ms. K. MAMATA
Counsel for the Respondent : None appeared
The Court made the following:
THE HO,N'BLE SRI JUSTII]E P.SAM KOSHYAND
THE HON'BLE SRI .IUSTICE I\. LAXMI NARAYANA
I.T.T.A. No. 388 of 2Ol8
JU]Q9M.t I$ [: ]fir i t 1 [(' ]I t [, [t,, ]rjr,/r.s ri. €, P" s,l], I(osfl v,r
Heard l\'ls.K.N{i nata, lcarncct Senior Sti-Lnding Courrsr:l .'rppeanng tordr, appcllant.
2. This appr:ai undc;'Sectiorr 2tlJA r.r[ the Ineon.re T:rx Act I 96l. hasbcun pref'clrc d by th cRr:r,enue as th( appellant ag.atnst the orderdl. 15.' I 2U l l r;assed bvthe lncom!' ['I'ari ]Appellate Tribunal, LlyderabadBcr.crr'A', i'r-it:rabarl, : ll.'l'.A.No 10-ii ilvd/;10 l5 lor the \ssessrrrerr'r Yt:ar20cr3 04
l. Ceutral ljoard ,rl [)rr'(.( t ['l'itxcs ]lCr]l)'-) has rssued (li.r:uiar No l7 of,lOI!i ot.oti 08 2(ji.i. ilrrncliir!, ttrc prc\.iolts Circular No 3 of 20 lu-lt. [i ][i.07.201tj, ][lr), ][6rtrn,-, ][r-nh:incing ]thc [n1,)nctart ]liraits f<.r, lihng er1:pea1sLr-y th(r Incomc 1'ar- I)cp;trrmcnt Lrctbre thc Itrcome'Iax Appellate Tribunals,Hlgh Cor-rrts iir.r'1 .iur-.r r'irrc Courr a.; a rrc<lsllrc for reducirrg litigation. I:r;rar agraph 2 of [Lhr. ]s:iirl [(lirr.r,rla:, ]rrve finrl tlrat thc monerar\/ Iimit hxed krrliling au appr:al bcfci-,-'titc ltigh [(lourt ]is Rs. i.OC crrrrt:
.i Ir, the isstant irppe:,I. tar r:ffect is rvcll [-relow ]the monetan' [mit5. 'Ihelt';crrc, i.i'r1- appcal illerl lrt thc l)til):r-'tlrte r.1t ts rjrsnri..:sr:rl ln rr:,nrs 9it.lrc alor cscutl [(-'ircular ]',1o. l7 o1 :20 lg CL.L\8.01J.20 I9. liowc.vcr'. if rlt( appcalcr;mes within l.trc.:rccp,-i,.,u undcr ltarag, i:ith i0 oi Circular ]\lo.l] of :Oi6. it
would be open to the Income Tax Departmcnt [to ][seek ][revivztl ][o[ ][the ][appeal]No order as to costs
6. Consequently, miscellaneous [petitiorls ][pending, ]if [any, shall ][stand]closed.
Sd/. C.V. MALLIKARJUNA JOINT REGISTRAR
//TRUE COPY//
n\tSECTION OFFICER
To,
1. The lncome Tax Appellate [Tribunal, Hyderabad ][Bench ][' ] [',]Hyderabad.Hyderabad.
z. The Commissioner of lncome [Tax ][Appeals-V, ][Hyderabad.]
3. The Deputy Commissioner [of ][lncome ][Tax ][Central ][Circle 9(1)']Hyderabad.Hyderabad.4. One CC to SRl. K. MAMATA [CHOUDARY, Advocate ] 5. Two CD Copies5. Two CD Copies
DL
HIGH COURT
DATED:0210812023
JUDGMENTlTTA.No.388 of 2018
DISMISSING THE APPEAL
\o\?-7Ib $".H
:r.l1t s14(o,,s($(o3 1 [li23]-'?-,. ^r.., [j]
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.