Itta/391/2016 Of The Director Of Income Tax (Exemptions) v. Sri Gowtham Academy Of General And Technical Education
High Court
20 Oct 2016 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · taphc
Parties
Itta/391/2016 Of The Director Of Income Tax (Exemptions) v. Sri Gowtham Academy Of General And Technical Education
Date of order
20 Oct 2016
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Itta/391/2016 Of The Director Of Income Tax (Exemptions) v. Sri Gowtham Academy Of General And Technical Education, the High Court (2016) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: The appeal is accordingly dismissed.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Sections referenced in this judgment
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTI CE SANJAY KUMAR AND
THE HON’BLE SMT. JUSTI CE ANI S
JUDGMENT: (per Hon’ble Sri Justice Sanjay Kumar)
This appeal by the Revenue under Section 260A of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (for short ‘the Act of 1961’), seeks to raise the following substantial question of law:
(i)“Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Appellate Tribunal is right in holding that the income of the assessee would be exempted under Section 11 of the Act of 1961, even in the absence of approval under Section 10(23C) (vi) of the Act of 1961?
It is however stated before us that this issue is no longer res integra. In I.T.T.A.No.635 of 2015, this Court considered the very same question of law and by judgment dated 13.07.2016, held that Sections 11 and 12AA, on the one hand, and Section 10(23C), on the other hand operate in distinct and separate fields though the criteria prescribed thereunder may overlap to a certain extent. Therefore, approval under Section 10(23C) of the Act of 1961 cannot be considered to be a prerequisite for granting exemption under Section 11 of the Act of 1961.
The appeal is accordingly dismissed. Pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall also stand dismissed. No order as to costs.
_______________________
SANJAY KUMAR, J
_____________________
ANI S, J
Date:20.10.2016
GJ
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.