Case LawHigh Court › Itta/39/2009 Of M/S Sri Venkateswara Tra...

Itta/39/2009 Of M/S Sri Venkateswara Traders, Machavaram v. Income Tax Officer, Ward-2, Bapatla

High Court 09 Jan 2024 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · aphc
Parties
Itta/39/2009 Of M/S Sri Venkateswara Traders, Machavaram v. Income Tax Officer, Ward-2, Bapatla
Date of order
09 Jan 2024
Assessment year(s)
1998-99
Outcome
Dismissed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Itta/39/2009 Of M/S Sri Venkateswara Traders, Machavaram v. Income Tax Officer, Ward-2, Bapatla, the High Court (2024) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Decision: 3.The Income Tax Tribunal Appeal is dismissed for want of prosecution.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: AMARAVATI FRIDAY ,THE TWELFTH DAY OF JANUARYTWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI NATH TILHARIANDTHE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N INCOME TAX TRIBUNAL APPEAL NO: 39 OF 2009 Appeal under Section 260(A) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 against the order of theIncomeTaxAppellateTribunal,VisakhapatnamBench,Visakhapatnamdated20/06/2008 passedin I.T.A.No.126/Vizag/2002 for the assessment year 1998-99preferred against the order of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), Gunturdated 24/12/2001 passed in ITA No.10/BPT/CIT(A)/G/2001-02[for][ the][ assessment]year 1998-99 preferred against the order of the Income Tax Officer, Ward-2, Bapatia,Guntur District passed in PAN/GIR No.V-375, dated 29/03/2001[for][ the][ assessment]year 1998-99. Between: M/S Sri Venkateswara Traders,Machavaram.,Machavaram,GunturDistrict.AndhraPradesh. AND ...Appellant/Appellant Income Tax officer, Ward-2,Bapatia., ward-2, Bapatia,Guntur district. ...Respondent/Respondent Counsel for the Appellant(s): SRI. A V RAGHU RAM (NOT APPEARED) Counsel for the Respondents: SRI B NARASIMHA SARMA The Court made the following: THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI NATH TILHARI AND THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH NUNEPALLY LNCOME tax tribunal appeal No.39 of 2000 JUDGMENT:- (per Hon’ble Sri Justice Ram Nath Tilhari) No representation for the appellant. 2.The matter pertains to the year 2009 and is listed in the Weekly Cause List. 3.The Income Tax Tribunal Appeal is dismissed for want of prosecution. No order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any pending,shall also stand closed. To, //TRUE COPY// Sd/- P. VENKATA RAMANAJOINT REGISTRAR SECTION OFFICER 1.The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Visakhapatnam Bench, VIsakhapatnam. 2. The Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), Guntur, Guntur District. 3.The Income Tax Officer, Ward-2, Bapatia, Guntur District. 4. One CC to Sri A.V.Raghu Ram, Advocate 5. One CC to Sri B.Narasimha Sarma, Advocate. . 6.Three CD Copies. MSR AL HIGH COURT:v«>t'\s< DATED:12/01/2024 ORDER ITTA.No.39 of 2009 DISMISSING THE APPEAL FOR WANT OFPROSECUTION egfojpi'wi^\j \/this-y
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan