Itta/39/2009 Of M/S Sri Venkateswara Traders, Machavaram v. Income Tax Officer, Ward-2, Bapatla
High Court
09 Jan 2024 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · aphc
Parties
Itta/39/2009 Of M/S Sri Venkateswara Traders, Machavaram v. Income Tax Officer, Ward-2, Bapatla
Date of order
09 Jan 2024
Assessment year(s)
1998-99
Outcome
Dismissed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Itta/39/2009 Of M/S Sri Venkateswara Traders, Machavaram v. Income Tax Officer, Ward-2, Bapatla, the High Court (2024) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Decision: 3.The Income Tax Tribunal Appeal is dismissed for want of prosecution.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
:: AMARAVATI
FRIDAY ,THE TWELFTH DAY OF JANUARYTWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI NATH TILHARIANDTHE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N
INCOME TAX TRIBUNAL APPEAL NO: 39 OF 2009
Appeal under Section 260(A) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 against the order of theIncomeTaxAppellateTribunal,VisakhapatnamBench,Visakhapatnamdated20/06/2008 passedin I.T.A.No.126/Vizag/2002 for the assessment year 1998-99preferred against the order of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), Gunturdated 24/12/2001 passed in ITA No.10/BPT/CIT(A)/G/2001-02[for][ the][ assessment]year 1998-99 preferred against the order of the Income Tax Officer, Ward-2, Bapatia,Guntur District passed in PAN/GIR No.V-375, dated 29/03/2001[for][ the][ assessment]year 1998-99.
Between:
M/S Sri Venkateswara Traders,Machavaram.,Machavaram,GunturDistrict.AndhraPradesh.
AND
...Appellant/Appellant
Income Tax officer, Ward-2,Bapatia., ward-2, Bapatia,Guntur district.
...Respondent/Respondent
Counsel for the Appellant(s): SRI. A V RAGHU RAM (NOT APPEARED)
Counsel for the Respondents: SRI B NARASIMHA SARMA
The Court made the following:
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI NATH TILHARI
AND
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH NUNEPALLY
LNCOME tax tribunal appeal No.39 of 2000
JUDGMENT:- (per Hon’ble Sri Justice Ram Nath Tilhari)
No representation for the appellant.
2.The matter pertains to the year 2009 and is listed in
the Weekly Cause List.
3.The Income Tax Tribunal Appeal is dismissed for
want of prosecution.
No order as to costs.
As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any pending,shall also stand closed.
To,
//TRUE COPY//
Sd/- P. VENKATA RAMANAJOINT REGISTRAR
SECTION OFFICER
1.The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Visakhapatnam Bench, VIsakhapatnam.
2.
The Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), Guntur, Guntur District.
3.The Income Tax Officer, Ward-2, Bapatia, Guntur District.
4.
One CC to Sri A.V.Raghu Ram, Advocate
5.
One CC to Sri B.Narasimha Sarma, Advocate. .
6.Three CD Copies.
MSR
AL
HIGH COURT:v«>t'\s<
DATED:12/01/2024
ORDER
ITTA.No.39 of 2009
DISMISSING THE APPEAL FOR WANT OFPROSECUTION
egfojpi'wi^\j \/this-y
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.