Case LawHigh Court › Itta/396/2016 Of Sri G Amarender Reddy,...

Itta/396/2016 Of Sri G Amarender Reddy, Hyderabad v. The Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax, Hyderabad

High Court 17 Mar 2021 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · taphc
Parties
Itta/396/2016 Of Sri G Amarender Reddy, Hyderabad v. The Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax, Hyderabad
Date of order
17 Mar 2021
Assessment year(s)
2009-10
Outcome
Dismissed

Case summary

In Itta/396/2016 Of Sri G Amarender Reddy, Hyderabad v. The Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax, Hyderabad, the High Court (2021) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT AT HYDERABAD WEDNESDAY, THE SEVENTEENTH DAY OF TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY ONE PRESENTTHE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE M.S.RAMACHANDRA RAOANDTHE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T.VINOD KUMAR .T.T.A. NO:96F 2016 against lncome the order Tax Tribunar Appear under of the rncome Tax Section Apperate 260-A Tribunar, Hyderabad of the lncome Tax Bench Act, 1 96.l ,A,,Hyderabad in rrA No.898/Hydr2o1s for assessment year 2009-10 dated i7ro2r2oi6preferred against the order of the commissioner of rncome Tax (Appears)-Xr,Hvderabad Appeal No.03 12 to 314 & 317lCC-5,Hyd/crr(A)-1/13-14/14-15 dated2410412015 preferred against the order of the Deputy commissioner of rncome Tax,circre 2(3) Hvderabad in pAN/GrR No.ACApG'1085F dated 30/06/2014. Betweenl GAWA AMARENDER REDDY. AND '.'APPELLANT THE DEpUTy COMMTSSTONER OF TNCOME TAX, Circte_2(3), Hyderabad ...RESPONDENT For the Appeilant : SRt CH.pUSHYAM K|RAN, AdvocateFor the Respondent : NONE APPEARED The Court made the following: JUDGIVENT THE HONOURABLE [.IUSTTCE ][M'S.RAMACHANDRA ] AND THE HONOURABLE [SRl ][JUS'TICE ][T. ] I.T.T.A.No.396 [of ][2016] JUDG [NT:][ (Per ][Hon'ble ][Sri ][Justice ] [S' Ramachandra Rao)] Learned [counsel ][fbr ][appellant ][seeks ][to ][withdraw this ][Appeal to]approach [the ][respondents under the ][Direct ][Taxes ][(Vivad ][Se ][Vishwas)]Act, 2020. Having [regard ][to ][the said submission' ][this ][appeal ][is ][dismissed]as withdrawn, [with ][liberty to ][approach ][this Court in the ][event there ][is]no resolution [of ][the ][dispute ][of ][the ][pettttoncr][ with ][tl.re ][l)ePa$ment]uncler [the said ][Act' ][No ][costs'] As a [sequel, ][miscellaneous ][petitions pendirlg' ][if ][any' shall ][stand] closed //TRUE ,TEREA'J ,TEREA'Jsd:BorsNf HI$t \w/SECTION To 1fl1,ffi:,,1ffi!l'l;;*ill.ltl,:n',rru*ri"Th#i:"Ki HIGH COURTDATED:171O312021JUDGMENTITTA.No.396 of [2016] ITTA DISMISSED [AS WITHDRAWN NO COSTS.] o/ ,-l ol-a e'ot\d ,24 r' 5./\,1?./\.*
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan