Case LawHigh Court › Itta/397/2016 Of Sri G Amarender Reddy,...

Itta/397/2016 Of Sri G Amarender Reddy, Hyderabad v. The Deputy Comm. Of Income Tax, Hyderabad

High Court 17 Mar 2021 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · taphc
Parties
Itta/397/2016 Of Sri G Amarender Reddy, Hyderabad v. The Deputy Comm. Of Income Tax, Hyderabad
Date of order
17 Mar 2021
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

Case summary

In Itta/397/2016 Of Sri G Amarender Reddy, Hyderabad v. The Deputy Comm. Of Income Tax, Hyderabad, the High Court (2021) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANAAT HYDERABAD WEDNESDAY, THE SEVENTEENTH DAY OF IUARCHTWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY ONE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE [JUSTICE M.S.RAMACHANDRA RAO]ANDTHE HONOURABLE [JUSTICE T.VINOD KUMAR] I.T.T.A. N[O: ][39][7 ][0F ][201] lncome Tax [Tribunal Appeal under Section ][260-4 ][of ][the ][lncome Tax ][Act' ][against]the order [of ][the ][Income ][Tax ][Appellate ][Tribunal' ][Hyderabad Bench ]['A' ][Hyderabad in ] No.900/Hyd/201 [5 ][for Assessment ][Year ][2011'12 dated ][17102/2016'] Between: G.Amarendra [ReddY,] AND The Deputy [Commissioner of lncome ][Tax' ][Circle-2(3)' Hyderabad'] ...APPELLANT ...RESPONDENT For the [Appellant ][: ] [CH'PUSHYAM ][KIRAN' Advocate] For the [Respondent ][:] The [Court ][made the ][following: ORDER] THE HONOURABLE [JI'JS'I'ICE ][M'S'RAMACHANDRA ] AND THE HONOURABLE [JUSTICE T. ] IT.T.A.No.[J][97 ][of20l6] JUD MENT:[ (Per ][Hon'ble ][Sri ][Justice ][M.S ][Ramachandra ][Rao)] Leamed counsel [for ][appellant ][seeks ][to withdraw ][this Appeal to]approach the respondents [under the ][Direct ]['Iaxes ][(Vivad ][Se ][Vishwas)]Act,2020. Having regard to the [said ][submission, ][this ][appeal ][is ][dismissed]as withdrawn, with liberty to approach [this Court ][in ][the event ][there ][is]no resolution of the dispute of the [petitioner ][with ][the ][Department]under the said Act. No costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions pending. il any. shall standclosed. Sd/-B.S.CHIRANJEEVIJOINT REGISTRARSECTION OFFICER ,TRUE COPY// To1. The lncome Tax [Appellate Tribunal, ][Hyderaba-d Bench - ][A, ][Hyderabad']2. One CC to Sri Ch"Plshyam [Kiran, ][Advocate (OPUC)]3. Two CD Copies^k HIGH COURT DATED:1710312021 ORDERlTTA.No.397 ol 2016 Io9-)$tr.,-'t*yj.aa')aL!c\\'a'f$t'.1r$ ITTA DISMISSED AS [COSTS.] 3)I
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan