Itta/402/2010 Of Commissioner Of Income Tax-Ii v. Sri Bhagwandas Karwa
High Court
21 Mar 2016 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · taphc
Parties
Itta/402/2010 Of Commissioner Of Income Tax-Ii v. Sri Bhagwandas Karwa
Date of order
21 Mar 2016
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Itta/402/2010 Of Commissioner Of Income Tax-Ii v. Sri Bhagwandas Karwa, the High Court (2016) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: Granting liberty as sought for, the appeal is dismissed aswithdrawn.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE RAMESH RANGANATHANANDTHE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE M.SATYANARAYANA MURTHY
I.T.T.A.No.402 of 2010
ORDER:(per Hon’ble Sri Justice Ramesh Ranganathan)
Sri K.Raji Reddy, learned Senior Standing Counsel for theIncome Tax Department, would submit that, in terms of CBDT CircularNo.21 of 2015 dated 10.12.2015, all appeals, where the tax effect isbelow Rs.20,00,000/-, are required to be withdrawn and, as the valueof the present appeal is less than Rs.20,00,000/-, the appellant maybe permitted to withdraw the appeal. Learned counsel would furthersubmit that liberty may be granted, in case it were to be found later thatthe subject matter of the appeal falls within the exceptions mentionedin the aforesaid Circular issued by the Central Board, to file anapplication for restoration of the appeal.
Granting liberty as sought for, the appeal is dismissed aswithdrawn. The miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall alsostand dismissed. There shall be no order as to costs.
_____________________________
RAMESH RANGANATHAN, J
Date:21.03.2016MRKR / CS
___________________________________
M. SATYANARAYANA MURTHY, J
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE RAMESH RANGANATHAN
AND
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE M.SATYANARAYANA MURTHY
MRKR / CS
I.T.T.A.No.402 of 2010
Date:21.03.2016
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.