Case LawHigh Court › Itta/404/2017 Of Pr Commissioner Of Inco...

Itta/404/2017 Of Pr Commissioner Of Income Tax, Hyd v. M/S. Hyderabad Menzies Air Cargo (P) Ltd., R.r.dist

High Court 11 Jul 2022 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · taphc
Parties
Itta/404/2017 Of Pr Commissioner Of Income Tax, Hyd v. M/S. Hyderabad Menzies Air Cargo (P) Ltd., R.r.dist
Date of order
11 Jul 2022
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

Case summary

In Itta/404/2017 Of Pr Commissioner Of Income Tax, Hyd v. M/S. Hyderabad Menzies Air Cargo (P) Ltd., R.r.dist, the High Court (2022) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE AT HYDERABAD IVONDAY,THE ELEVENTH DAY OF TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY TWO PRESENT THE HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE UJJAL ANDTHE HON'BLE MRS JUSTICE SUREPALLI INCOME TAX TRIBUNAL APPEAL[NO: 404 OF 2017] Appeal under Section 260 A of the lncome Tax [Act, ][1961 ][against ][order]dated 06-10-2016 in l.T.A. No. 423 I HYD|2O15 [on ][the ][file ][of the ][Court ][of ][the]lncome Tax Appellate Tribunal Hyderabad ['8" ][Bench, ][Hyderabad ], [Assessment]Year 2O11-12 prefered against the order dated [23-05-2015 ][in ][lT-A.No. ][O426|DC-]2(3llcfi (A)-2t2013-14 on the file of the [Commissioner ][of ][lncome ][Tax ][( Appeals ])-2, Hyderabad [preferred ]against the order [of ][Deputy Commissioner ][of ][lncome ][Tax]Ctcle2(2), Hyderabad dated 08-02-2014 [in PAN ][/GlR ][No. ][ ] Between: Pr. Commissioner of lncome Tax-2, [Hyderabad] ...APPELLANT/Respondent AND tvl/S. Hyderabad Menzies Air [Cargo (P) ]Ltd., [Air ][Cargo Terminal ][Rall'19qlO-ni]lnternaiional Airport, ShamshabaU, R.R.District. [...RESPONDENT/ ][Appellant] Counsel for the Appellant: Ms. K MAMATA S.C for lncome tax Dept Counsel for the Respondent: SRI CHALLA GUNARANJAN The Court made the following: JUDGMENT: THE HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE UJJAL BIIIIYANAND THE HON'BLE MRS JI,TSTICE ST'REPALLI NANDAITTA No.4O4 of 2OL7 JUDGMENT: 1'er ihe Hon bte the (:tuef Justice ILJat Bhuaan) Heard Ms. K.Mamta Choudary, learned SeniorStanding Counsel for lncome Tax Department appearingfor the appellant and Mr. Challa Gunaranj an, learnedcounsel for the respondent 2. This appeal has been Iiled against the order dated06.10.2016 passed by thc Income Tax Appellate Tribuna-I,Hyderabad Bench'B', Hyderabad1nI.T.A.No.a23lH1,d/2015 ft>r the assessment year 20l1-12. 3. The appeal u'as admitted for hearing on lO.O7.2Ol7.4. Toda.r, learned counsel for the appellant submits thaton an applicatior-r filed b,r' the respondent under the DirectTax Vivad Se Vishrvas Scheme, 2O2O, the matter has beensettled betu'een thc partics lollora,ing w,hich full and llnalI iz settlement dues have been paid by the respondent.Therefore, appellant would like to withdraw the appeal. 5. in view of the above, this appeal is dismissedonwithdrarva l. 6. Miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shatlstand closed. However, there shall be no order as to costs. SD/.B.S.CHIRANJEEVIJIONTSTRAR//TRUE COPY//SECTIFFICER To 1. The lncome Tax Appellate Triqunal Hyderabad "B" Bench, Hyderabad2. The Commissioner of lncome Tax ( Appeals )-2, Hyderabad ['] 4. 3. The One CC Deputy_ to Ms. go.r.nTl99igngr K. MAMATA CHOUDARY,. S,C _of lncome Tax iircte FOR iNCOiviE 2 (4 , Hyderabad6ept[OpUC]-5. [One ][CC to ][Mr. ]CHALLA GUNARANJAN Advocate topucl6. Trvo CD Copies 7. One 8. One q 7. One Sparc Copy 8. One Spare Copy HIGH COURT DATED:1 110712022 ORDER l-l'TA.No.404 of 2017 DISMISSINC THE ITTA AS WII-III)RAWN (0w\l; SIAT€1IvI7-loo,J[B [sEP ][$n]i:
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan