Itta/405/2013 Of Commissioner Of Income-Tax(Central) v. M/S.smr Builders Pvt Ltd
High Court
11 Sep 2013 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · taphc
Parties
Itta/405/2013 Of Commissioner Of Income-Tax(Central) v. M/S.smr Builders Pvt Ltd
Date of order
11 Sep 2013
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Itta/405/2013 Of Commissioner Of Income-Tax(Central) v. M/S.smr Builders Pvt Ltd, the High Court (2013) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: We therefore dismiss the appeal. _____________________ K.J.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH ATHYDERABAD
THE HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SRI KALYAN JYOTI SENGUPTAAND
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE K.C. BHANU
I.T.T.A. No. 405 of 2013
DATE: 11.09.2013
Between:
The Commissioner of Income Tax (Central),Hyderabad.
… Appellant
AndM/s. SMR Builders Pvt., Ltd.,Hyderabad.
… Respondent
This Court made the following:
THE HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SRI KALYAN JYOTI SENGUPTAANDTHE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE K.C. BHANU
I.T.T.A. No. 405 of 2013
JUDGMENT:(Per the Hon’ble the Chief Justice Sri Kalyan Jyoti Sengupta)
We have heard Sri J.V. Prasad, learned counsel for the appellant, andgone through the impugned judgment and order of the learned Tribunal.
It appears that the learned Tribunal on fact found that precondition forinitiation of penalty proceedings was not satisfied and the authority below hasestimated the income and presumed that there has been concealment ofrelevant particulars relating to the income.
In our view, in case of estimation of income discarding the books ofaccount, there cannot be concealment and if there is no concealment, thequestion of penalty proceedings does not arise. The learned Tribunal hascorrectly passed the impugned order by following the settled principle of lawlaid down by the higher authorities in umpteen number of decisions.
We therefore dismiss the appeal.
_____________________
K.J. SENGUPTA, CJ
________________
K. C. BHANU, J
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.