Itta/407/2013 Of Commissioner Of Income Tax-Iii v. M/S Sde Engineers Private Limited
High Court
11 Sep 2013 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · taphc
Parties
Itta/407/2013 Of Commissioner Of Income Tax-Iii v. M/S Sde Engineers Private Limited
Date of order
11 Sep 2013
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Itta/407/2013 Of Commissioner Of Income Tax-Iii v. M/S Sde Engineers Private Limited, the High Court (2013) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed. _____________________ K.J.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH ATHYDERABAD
THE HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SRI KALYAN JYOTI SENGUPTAANDTHE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE K.C. BHANU
I.T.T.A. No. 407 of 2013
DATE: 11.09.2013
Between:
Commissioner of Income Tax-III,Hyderabad.
… Appellant
And
M/s. SDE Engineers Private Ltd.,Hyderabad.
… Respondent
This Court made the following:
THE HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SRI KALYAN JYOTI SENGUPTAANDTHE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE K.C. BHANU
I.T.T.A. No. 407 of 2013
JUDGMENT:(Per the Hon’ble the Chief Justice Sri Kalyan Jyoti Sengupta)
We have heard Sri B. Narasimha Sarma, learned counsel for theappellant, and gone through the impugned judgment and order of the learnedTribunal.
We have seen that the learned Tribunal, in fact, has not decidedanything else and remanded the matter for fresh decision. Therefore, we donot see any reason to interfere with the impugned order.
Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed.
_____________________
K.J. SENGUPTA, CJ
________________
K. C. BHANU, J
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue