Case LawHigh Court › Itta/409/2010 Of M/S.janaki Rama Enterpr...

Itta/409/2010 Of M/S.janaki Rama Enterprises [P] Ltd v. Dy.commissioner Of Income Tax

High Court 05 Oct 2021 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · taphc
Parties
Itta/409/2010 Of M/S.janaki Rama Enterprises [P] Ltd v. Dy.commissioner Of Income Tax
Date of order
05 Oct 2021
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Other

Case summary

In Itta/409/2010 Of M/S.janaki Rama Enterprises [P] Ltd v. Dy.commissioner Of Income Tax, the High Court (2021) decided the matter.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANAAT HYDERABAD TUESDAY, THE FIFTH DAY OF OCTOBERTWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY ONE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE A.RAJASHEKER ANDTHE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T.VINOD LA.NO.1 0F 2021AND/ IN I.T.T.A. NO: 409 0F 2010 lncome Tax Tribunal Appeal under [Section ][260-4 of ][the ][lncome ][Tax ][Act, ][1961']against the order dated [2SlOgl2OOB ][in ] [No.735 ][lo ][737lHydl2007 on ][the file of ][the]lncome Tax Appellate Tribunal, Hyderabad [Bench ]['A' ][Hyderabad, the Assessment Year]2OO1-02 to 2003-04 [preferred ]against [the order dated ][91412007 ][in ][Appeal No.lTA ][287 to]2g1lDC 2(1 ) CIT [(A)-lll/ ]06-07 on [the ][file ][of ][the commissioner ][of ][lncome ][Tax ][(Appeals-]V), Hyderabad, [preferred ]against the [order dated ][2011212008 ][in GIR No.AAACJ'Z17H]/J-041 on the file of the lncome [Tax Officer, Ward Circle-(2) (1) ][Hyderabad] Between: Janakiram Enterprises [P] Ltd, [Hyderabad.] ...PETITIONER/APPELLANT AND Deputy Commlssioner of [lncome Tax, ][Cicle-2 ][1], [Hyderabad] ...RESPONDENT lA NO: 1 OF 2021 Petition under section [15'1 ]of [cPC ][praying ][that ][in ][the ][circumstances stated ][in]the affidavit filed therewith, [the ][High ][court ][may be ][pleased ][to ][permit ][the ][Appellant]company to withdraw the [present appeal ][for asst year ][2001 ][- ][02 ][bearing ITTA ][No.]409 of 2010 under the VSV scheme [in ][the ][interest of justice and be ][pleased ][to ][pass]such further Order or orders as [the ][Hon'ble ][Court ][may deem ][fit.] For the Appellant : SRI Y.RATNAKAR, [Advocate] For the Respondent : NO The Coud made the following: ORDER HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE A.RAJASHEKER REDDY AND HONOURABLE SRI JUSTTCE T.VINOD KUMAR IA.No.1 of 2O21in/andITTA.No.4O9 of 201O COMMONGMENT:rp er Hon'bLe Si Justice A.Raia sheker Reddu) Counsel for the appeUant has filed IA.No.1 of 2O2lseeking to withdraw the appeal on the ground that theappellant had made an application under the Direct TaxVivaad Se Vishwas Scheme, 2O2O and, that Form 3 was alsoVivaad Se Vishwas Scheme, 2O2O and, that Form 3 was alsoissued by the Designated Authority. 2. Recording the same, IA.No.l of 2021 is a_llowed and theAppeal is dismissecl as withdrawn granting liberty to theappellant to revive the appeal in the event there is nosatisfactory resolution under the said Scheme. No orcter as tocosts. 3Consequently, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any,sha,ll stand closed.sha,ll stand closed. Sd/.K.SRINIVASA RAOJOINT REGISTRAR\/'SECTION OFFICER //TRUE COPYII To1.The Chairman, lncome Tax Appellate Tribunal, Bench ['A' ]Hyderabad.2.The Commissioner of lncome Tax (Appeals)-lll, Hyderabad.>The lncome Tax Officer, Circle -2(1) Hyderabad.4.One CC to Sri Y.Ratnakar, Advocate [(OPUC)]5.Two CD Copies6.One Spare CopyKj \ HIGH COURT DATED:05/10/2021 COMMON ORDER l.A.No.1 ot 2021IN /ANDITTA.No.409 ot 2010 DISMISSING THE APPEAL AS WITHDRAWN. I1r1-t2rt:io5...:o2 [2 ][osrzuA]t:* Lls5 7o7,/
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan