Case LawHigh Court › Itta/411/2016 Of Sri Gavva Amarender Red...

Itta/411/2016 Of Sri Gavva Amarender Reddy v. The Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax

High Court 17 Mar 2021 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · taphc
Parties
Itta/411/2016 Of Sri Gavva Amarender Reddy v. The Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax
Date of order
17 Mar 2021
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Itta/411/2016 Of Sri Gavva Amarender Reddy v. The Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax, the High Court (2021) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANAAT HYDERABAD WEDNESDAY, THE SEVENTEENTH DAY OF MARCHTWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY ONE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE M.S.RAMACHANDRA RAOANDTHE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T,VINOD KUMAR |.T.T.A. NO: 4'11 OF 2016 lncome Tax Tribunal Appeal under Section 260-4 of the lncome Tax Act, 1961 ,against the order of the lncome Tax Appellate Tribunal, Hyderabad Bench-A,Hyderabad in ITA No.896/Hyd12015, for AssessmentYear 2007-2008 dated 1710212016Hyderabad in ITA No.896/Hyd12015, for AssessmentYear 2007-2008 dated 1710212016 Between: Gawa Amarender Reddy ...APPELLANT AND The Deputy Commissioner of lncome Tax, Circle-2 (3), Hyderabad. ...RESPONDENT For the Appellant : SRI CH.PUSHYAM KIRAN, Advocate For the Respondent : NONE APPEARED The Courl made the following: ORDER THE HONOURABLE SRI .IUSTICE M.S.RAMACHl.NDRA RAO AND THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T. VINOD KUMAR I.T.T.A.No.4ll of 2016 JUDGMENT : (Per Hon'ble Sri Justice M.S. Ranrachandra Rao) Learned counsel for appellant seeks to withdrarv this Appeal toapproach the respondents under the Direct Taxes (Vivarl Se Vrshwas)Act, 2020. Having regard to the said sr.rbrnission, this appeal is dismissedas withdrawn, with liberty to approach this Court in the event there isno resolution of the dispute of the petitioner with the Departmentunder the said Act. No costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous rretitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. ":B,RfH'S!+ffi"J6t,SECTION //TRUE COPY// To 1. The lncome [Tax Appellate Tribunal, Hyderabad ][Bench ][-A' ][Hyderabad']i. +il; ['Dffiil ][c6mniiSjioner oi ][income ][iax' ][circle.-1(3)' ][Hvderabad']5. d;-c-it,;.,sii [Crr.pusnvam Kiran, Advocate ][(oPUC)]4. Two CD [Copies] .rKj. JUDGMENTITTA.No.411 of 2016 ITTA DISMISSED [AS WITHDRAWN.] \ [dE ][5lA][ TA])Poz(.)0 [2021]o.L* DEspATc
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan