Case Law › High Court › Itta/41/2002 Of Commr Of Income Tax Karn...

Itta/41/2002 Of Commr Of Income Tax Karnataka Bangalore v. M/S.sarvaraya Sugars Ltd. Chelluru

High Court 08 Jun 2017 In favour of: Assessee

Forum / Bench

High Court · taphc

Parties

Date of order

08 Jun 2017

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Dismissed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Itta/41/2002 Of Commr Of Income Tax Karnataka Bangalore v. M/S.sarvaraya Sugars Ltd. Chelluru, the High Court (2017) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Decision: That being so, this appeal does not deserve consideration on merits and is accordingly dismissed.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR AND THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE GUDISEVA SHYAM PRASAD ITTA.No.41 of 2002 JUDGMENT:(Per Hon’ble Sri Justice Sanjay Kumar) This appeal by the Revenue under Section 260-A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 was filed in the year 2002. It is however represented by Smt.M.Kiranmayee, learned Standing Counsel for the Revenue, that the tax effect involved in the present appeal is below the monetary limit filed by the Central Board of Direct Taxes, under Circular No.21 of 2015 dated 10.12.2015. That being so, this appeal does not deserve consideration on merits and is accordingly dismissed. However, it shall not preclude the Revenue from taking appropriate steps, if it is hereafter discovered that notwithstanding the monetary limit fixed by the CBDT, the matter would fall within the ambit of any of the exceptions enumerated in the aforesaid circular. Pending miscellaneous petitions shall also stand dismissed. No order as to costs. ____________________ SANJAY KUMAR, J _______________________________ GUDISEVA SHYAM PRASAD, J Date: 08.06.2017. TJMR

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.