Itta/41/2014 Of The Director Of Income-Tax [Exemptions] v. Perika Vidyarthi Vasathi Gruham
High Court
13 Feb 2014 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · taphc
Parties
Itta/41/2014 Of The Director Of Income-Tax [Exemptions] v. Perika Vidyarthi Vasathi Gruham
Date of order
13 Feb 2014
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Itta/41/2014 Of The Director Of Income-Tax [Exemptions] v. Perika Vidyarthi Vasathi Gruham, the High Court (2014) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Sections referenced in this judgment
The order — as passed by the High Court
HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SRI KALYAN JYOTI SENGUPTAANDHON’BLE SRI JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR
I.T.T.A.No.41 of 2014
Date: 13-02-2014
Between:
The Director of Income Tax (Exemptions),Hyderabad
.....Appellant
AND
Perika Vidyarthi Vasathi Gruham,Hyderabad.
...Respondent
HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SRI KALYAN JYOTI SENGUPTAANDHON’BLE SRI JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR
I.T.T.A.No.41 of 2014
JUDGMENT:(per Hon’ble the Chief Justice Sri Kalyan Jyoti Sengupta )
We have heard the learned Counsel for the appellant andgone through the judgment and order of the learned Tribunal.
It appears that the learned Tribunal on fact found that theassessee trust has been carrying on charitable activities for morethan one community and hence the provisions of Explanation 2 toSection 13 (1) (b) of the Income Tax Act are fulfilled. Moreover, itwas also found that after granting registration to the assessee, anapproval under Section 80G(5) has been granted earliertill 31-03-2009. The learned Tribunal following the rule ofconsistency has granted the relief. We, therefore, do not find anyreason to interfere with the judgment and order of the learnedTribunal.
Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed. No order as to costs.
___________________
K.J.
SENGUPTA, CJ
__________________
SANJAY KUMAR, J
13-02-2014 Gsn
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.