Itta/418/2012 Of Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Hansraj Jain
High Court
20 Jun 2022 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · aphc
Parties
Itta/418/2012 Of Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Hansraj Jain
Date of order
20 Jun 2022
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Itta/418/2012 Of Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Hansraj Jain, the High Court (2022) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: Accordingly, this Appeal is dismissed as withdrawn[with]the liberty sought for.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH:: AMARAVATI
MONDAY ,THE TWENTIETH DAY OF JUNETWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY TWO
t
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE A V SESHA SAI
AND
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI NATH TILHARI
INCOME TAX TRIBUNAL APPEAL NO: 418 OF 2012
Appeal under section 260-A of the Income Tax Act 1961, against orders ofthe Appellate Tribunal passed in IT(S.S) A.No. 67A/izag/2000[dt.][ 13-6-2008][ FOR]THE Block period: 1987-88 to 1997-98 preferred against[the][ order][ of][ the][ office][ of]the Commissioner of Income-Tax (appeals)-V, Central Hyderasbad,inITA No.1596/DC-a/RJY/CIT(A)V/1999-2000 dated 29.11.1999 for[Block]Period1987-88to 1997-98 preferred against the order of the office of the Deputy Commissionerof Income-Tax (Circle-1), Rajahmundry, dated 22.02.1999[for][ Block][ Period]1987-88 to 1997-98.
Between:
Commissioner of Income Tax, Rajahmundry
...PETITIONER
AND
HansraJ Jain, Rajasthan Finance Corpn., Market Street, Kakinada, E.G.District.
...RESPONDENT
Counsel for the Appellant(s): SRI. M KIRANMAYEE(SC FOR INCOMETAX)Counsel for the Respondents: G V N HARIThe Court made the following:
/
HON'BLB SRI JUSTICE A.V.SESHA SAIAND
HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI NATH TILHARI
I.T.T.A.No.418 of 2012
ORDER:- (PerAVSS,J)
Smt.M.Kiranmayee,learnedStandingCounselfortheIncome Tax Department would submit that in termsof[Central]Board Direct Taxes Circular No. 17 of 2019, dated 08.08.2019,[all]appealswherethetaxeffectisbelowRs. 1,00,00,000/-arerequired to be withdrawn, and as the value of the present appealis less than Rs. 1,00,00,000/-, the appellant may be permitted towithdraw the appeal. The learned counsel would further[submit]that liberty may be granted, in case it were to be[found][ later][ that]thesubjectmatterof theappealfallswithintheexceptionsmentioned in the circular issued by the Central Board[to]file anapplication for restoration of the appeal.
Accordingly, this Appeal is dismissed as withdrawn[with]the liberty sought for. There shall be no order as to costsof theAppeal.
As a sequel, interlocutory applications pending, if any, inthis appeal shall stand closed.
SD/-E.KAMESWARA RAODEPUTY REGISTRAR
//TRUE COPY//r-..SEfeTTON OFFICER
To,
1.Visak?,a°parnlm'^'"^^hapatnam Bench.
2. The Commissioner of Income-Tax (appeals)-V, Central Hyderabad,
3. The Deputy Commissioner of Income-Tax
(Circle-1), Rajahmundry,
4. One CC to SRI. M KIRANMAYEE(SC FOR INCOMETAX) Advocate ) Advocate 5. One CC to THE G V N HARI, Advocate
6. Two CD Copies
SRM
HIGH COURT
DATED:20/06/2022
ORDER
ITTA.No.418 of 2012
DISMISSING THE APPEAL AS WITHDRAWN
%/i
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.